My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-05-19 Leeward Exh D (SPP 16-188)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-05-19 Leeward Exh D (SPP 16-188)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2016 3:48:35 PM
Creation date
7/21/2016 3:48:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
road, as the first individual was talking about, is simply not suitable for large trucks; it’s very <br />dangerous. I’m also a former law enforcement officer; I wouldn’t want to be having large trucks <br />on that road. Thank you. <br /> <br />UNGER: Thank you. <br /> <br />BECKHAM: My name is Brad Beckham. I’ve had careers in architect, and I know your job is <br />difficult, try to merge business interest with residential ones. Having done work in probably <br />close to 80 cities, numerous counties, most of which have noise ordinances you can, if you <br />choose, require testing. A typical ordinance is like an 80 decibel readings at the property line, <br />that sort of thing. And you can do dust testing as well of the air, preferably on a windy day <br />where it might carry of the sand. And as far as the noise, you might consider dropping at the <br />maximum height of the frontend loaders into the steel beds of the trucks, and actually getting <br />hardline data. It feels to me everybody’s idea of dust or noise is subjective. I feel that, you <br />know, living a half mile away I do feel tremors and it’s really loud, but my opinion might defer <br />with somebody else’s, especially who has a business interest. So my recommendation for you <br />would be get some realign testing and follow existing laws, and that might help you make your <br />decisions. I have to apologize I’m late for a doctor appointment, so I’ve got to bail right now. <br /> <br />UNGER: Thank you. <br /> <br />MATSUKAWA: My name is Mike Matsukawa. I’m an attorney. I represent the petitioners for <br />the contested case. And I forgot to sign up Jeff Citron who is the president, and he submitted his <br />sign-up sheets. <br /> <br />UNGER: I got that and so — <br /> <br />MATSUKAWA: Okay. <br /> <br />UNGER: — he’ll have an opportunity to testify. <br /> <br />MATSUKAWA: Thank you. I just want to point out a couple, a few things for the Commission <br />and its staff. It seems like the application and the background report was put together pretty <br />hurriedly. Some things that stand out is there seems to be one application for the drainage <br />improvements, which in itself is its own project and ought to be treated as a standalone project; <br />however, cobbled to this are the additional request, which make this application somewhat <br />confusing. <br /> <br />Secondly, there are some preliminary issues that should be explored but weren’t, which is <br />whether a Board of Land and Natural Resources Mining Permit is required under Chapter 181. <br />As to the noise and air emission issues, which the prior speaker just addressed, I don’t think there <br />has been any analysis on air emission or noise. Both subjects are very complicated topics. <br />When the Hawai‘i Electric Light Company built their Keāhole power plant, they did extensive <br />studies on both noise and air emissions because of the surrounding neighborhood that’s Palisades <br />and the Ag Park. They did the study, and also on the issue of noise the judge who were <br />supervising the case determined that where and how you measure the noise is a very intricate <br />5 <br />EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.