Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Dunlap displayed site photographs to familiarize the Commissioners with the subject property <br />and building under construction, and described the proposed project. He noted that the proposed <br />carport structure as depicted on the plan, presented a problem where there was insufficient space for <br />the car parked in the end stall to be able to reverse because of the irregular shape of the parcel at the <br />western corner; however, that would be addressed by the Planning Department during the Plan <br />Approval process, and so the Commission should focus on the design aspect of the project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Pernis questioned about the drawings included in the application, which showed <br />fewer photovoltaic (“PV”) panels on the roof of the existing building than 47 as described in the <br />applicant’s request letter, and said that the Commission could not approve more panels than actually <br />presented. The applicant’s representative, Brooke Bohnhoff, responded that they had originally <br />applied to Hawai‘i Electric Light Company for 47 plus 175 PV panels, but that the owner had since <br />reduced the number; she apologized for the oversight. She passed around a sample PV panel, and <br />said that it had anti-reflective coating to minimize the glare. She added that the PV panels would be <br />visible from Kuakini Highway but not from Walua Road. With respect to the reason for the project, <br />she stated that the owner was trying to offset the high electricity usage anticipated by potential ice <br />cream business. In response to Commissioner Van Pernis’ inquiry, Ms. Bohnhoff confirmed that the <br />exact number of PV panels would be 30 for the existing building and 175 for the proposed carport <br />structure. <br /> <br />It was moved by Commissioner Van Pernis and seconded by Commissioner Au Hoy that the <br />Commission recommend the Planning Director’s approval of the proposed project with a reduction in <br />the number of PV panels for the existing building from 47 to 30, as confirmed by the applicant’s <br />representative. There were no discussions on the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion <br />carried with five ayes (Van Pernis, Au Hoy, Akina, Kern and Sullenberger) and two absent and <br />excused (Andreae and Dahlberg). <br /> <br />2. Proposed revisions to Building “B” at Henry Street Landing as approved by KVDC on <br />December 4, 2014. General revisions include: minor re-siting of building and changes to <br />building and roof elevations. Applicant: Riehm Owensby Planners Architects, LLC. <br />Landowner: Relo Kona LLC. TMK: 7-5-004: 031. Location: South side of Henry Street <br />between Jack-in-the-Box and Starbucks. <br /> <br />Mr. Dunlap displayed site photographs to familiarize the Commissioners with the subject property. <br />Full-size drawings were also displayed on the wall, which compared the proposed revisions with the <br />previously approved plans side by side. Mr. Dunlap then deferred to the applicant for the <br />presentation. <br /> <br />Mr. Michael Riehm, the representative and architect for the project, gave a presentation focusing on <br />the following major revisions: 1) Replace the landscaping and lava rock-faced concrete retaining wall <br />at the rear of the building, with a concrete embankment and a four-foot high black metal fence; 2) <br />raise the building pad five feet, thereby reduce the remainder of the lava rock-faced retaining wall by <br />half and make the building level with the pedestrian access from Henry Street; 3) add a rock wall <br />along Henry Street; 4) relocate the air-conditioning units from the rooftop to the sides of the building, <br />thereby eliminate the flat rooftop cutout; 5) add another window on the Henry Street elevation; and, <br />6) eliminate the stucco base from the storefront and instead extend the glass to the finish floor. He <br />2 <br /> <br />