My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-08-09 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-08-09 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2016 3:18:43 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:18:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Goodenow: Well I would say it's really not my practice to comment on <br /> allegations....anonymous....alleged anonymous statements so no <br /> I'll just leave it to the Board to proceed. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Thank you Mr. Goodenow. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Madame Chair...I would like to make a motion...make a motion to <br /> dismiss this petition. In making that motion I want to note that I <br /> find it strange to have a petition submitted that makes accusations <br /> against one of the Board members and it's anonymous and it has <br /> no reference to anyone. Anonymous petitions or anonymous <br /> statements I give zero credibility to so I just think we're wasting <br /> our time to even review it. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Thank you. <br /> Mr. Robinson: That was my motion will a little bit of added bravado at the end. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Thank you. Do we have a second? <br /> Mr. Adams: I would second. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Do we have any further discussion in regards to this motion? <br /> Mr. Adams: I do. These petitions will come in front of this Board occasionally <br /> that will indicate dissatisfaction with the variety of the Board <br /> members. It's part of the responsibility of the Board in my view <br /> that we take them seriously and that we manage our way through <br /> them looking at the ordinances that we have...the Code and the <br /> Charter...related to the way that the petition is talking about <br /> it...when I'm looking at the petition...the crucks of the petition in <br /> itself was essentially some type of behavior...didn't have anything <br /> to do with any type of comments. The comments themselves were <br /> factual as far as I understand them...and so the idea that this <br /> petition is going to...one an anonymous understanding by <br /> somebody who's never been met...Mr. Goodenow and then <br /> relaying that...and that individual not being available...yes we <br /> don't have judicial evidentiary requirements but we still have to <br /> take into account the idea that somebody doesn't just get to say and <br /> then remain anonymous. That doesn't make any sense particularly <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.