2016-07-21 Leeward Exh B (Amend SMA 05-007)

Home

infrastructure. And there is no infrastructure that’s coming in as a sidewalk. If you look at Kahalu‘u and Lyman’s, there is no sidewalks. UNGER: Okay, I’d like to redirect the discussion again and questions from the Commissioners specific to the petitioner and her petition for standing. We are going to have to make that decision first prior to getting into traffic, getting into SMA, getting into the SMA and the Environmental Impact Statement. So I’m encouraging questions from the Commissioners but specific to the petition for standing here. Carr Smith, Commissioner Carr Smith. CARR SMITH: Chair Unger, may I make a motion? UNGER: Yeah, we were going to continue discussion and then open it up to public testimony — CARR SMITH: All right, very good. UNGER: — prior to a motion. Commissioners, any other questions for petitioner, applicant or County? KAHOLO: Yeah, I’ve got one. We understand your concerns, we do, but that’s the only thing I’m hearing, which is your concern of traffic. But Ms. McMichael discussed earlier, you know, he had his option to decide what he did, you have yours. Okay, this time I’d like to ask the Commission, you know, where are we going from here? We already heard her concerns. Can we move on? UNGER: Yeah, absolutely. Once we close, once we are done here, we’ll ask for public testimony, and I’ll be requesting from members of the public again specifically to testify in regard to the petition for standing on hand. I will be discouraging testimony about traffic, about SMA, about archaeological issues, the Judd Trail; what we are specifically looking at from the public in this testimony is whether we, whether the Commission should grant standing or not. So from here we’ll invite the public up for testimony. We’ll hear testimony. We’ll close that portion of the meeting, and then we’ll be prepared to make a motion and continue our discussion. BRILHANTE: Excuse me, Chair? I have a concern and a question regarding the statement you just made. Are you going to provide public testimony for this petition for standing? Or is the public testimony going to be later on specific to the original application. UNGER: Right, I did speak to Deputy Corporate Counsel and it’s my understanding that we have a list of six members of the public that would like to testify on this petition for standing, and I was going to allow it. PATEL: Yeah, so, to clarify, the public testimony, once we are done with Commissioners’ questions, are going to be as related to the application or the petition for standing, whatever you want to testify about. Once that’s done, the Commission is going to have to decide whether, or what they are going to do with the petition for standing. And depending on what happens there we’ll see what the next steps are. 11 EXHIBIT B