Laserfiche WebLink
And, this is a photo of the walkway and the gate from the medical office property down to the <br />subject property. <br />And, then this is a view—these photos were actually taken in 2011 when the Applicant <br />previously applied for zoning of the property, and you can see, this is standing from the medical <br />center properties looking down towards Punahele Street. So, Punahele Street's in the <br />background here. You have the correctional facility beyond that. And, then this is the subject <br />property, and then this is the house between the subject property and Hala`i Hill. That's the roof. <br />This is the other direction. The subject property in the foreground. Correctional facility in the <br />background, and then the adjacent house to the west. <br />The Director is recommending that the Commission forward an unfavorable recommendation to <br />the County Council for several reasons. This current application is the third attempt by the <br />Landowner and Applicant to rezone the property for use as a parking lot. During these previous <br />attempts, the Landowner/Applicant and neighboring property owners could not reach agreement <br />about what measures could be taken to reduce the nuisances associated with a parking lot that <br />would affect the neighbors. <br />Due to the lack of agreement, the County Council did not approve the rezoning request in 2007, <br />and the Planning Department and the Planning Commission did not recommend the approval of <br />the rezone request in 2011. <br />And, the main reason for recommending an unfavorable recommendation at this point in time is <br />that there's been no substantial changes in the application or with agreement between the <br />neighbors and the Applicant/Landowner since the previous rezone in 2011. <br />The Hala`i Kumiai and its members and the immediately adjacent neighbors continue to oppose <br />the rezone to—of the property for commercial zoning. <br />And, you have a letter from the Kumiai and an agreement—it's a Memorandum of Agreement <br />that the Applicant had submitted by letter dated May 31st, 2016. And, they transmitted a <br />Memorandum of Agreement, but the Agreement was not signed by the neighbors. <br />And, introducing commercial uses into this established residential neighborhood would break up <br />the cohesiveness of the overall land use pattern and create nuisances such as noise, light, exhaust, <br />odors, and traffic that cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures. <br />Granting the commercial zoning would not result in an appropriate land use pattern at this time <br />and would not conform to the General Plan policies and goals. <br />So, those are the main reasons for the Director's unfavorable recommendation. Since we sent <br />out your Background and Recommendation, we just received a—three pages of maps submitted <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT C <br />