|
I passed out a three, you know, three -sheet item. The first one is like—reflects like the map
<br />which is the rezoning ordinance back in 19I believe it was 1995. And, it shows the area where
<br />the Hilo Surgical Center is and the Rehab at Hilo facility as, you know, in relation to the balance
<br />of the property, and, when that, subsequent to the rezoning of that area, the project was
<br />developed; the surgical center was developed, as well as the Rehab of the Pacific, was
<br />developed. We all know, I think, like as the request shows, the request is essentially to allow for
<br />additional parking.
<br />When the project was initially approved, the Zoning Code at that time required five stalls for
<br />every physician, and they had met that requirement. Plan Approval was issued. Subsequent to
<br />that, the Zoning Code was changed to say that they eliminated the number of stall requirement
<br />per physician, but instead just went generically, and, the generic requirement is one stall for
<br />every 300 square feet. So, ironically, with the change in the Zoning Code relative to parking,
<br />now you actually have less stalls required, you know, for a physician. It averages out like on an
<br />average a thousand square foot office, physician's office building, you now require like about
<br />three, maybe at the most four, parking stalls.
<br />Notwithstanding that, I think the surgical center and the rest of that complex, they probably fell
<br />victim, you know, to their success and, you know, just the overall demand for medical service.
<br />The problem is that, with the parking is that you have overlapping requirements. You know, it's
<br />just like you're gonna go to the golf course if you're a golfer, and, you know, your tee time is at
<br />8 o'clock and another set of tee time is like around 11 or 11:30. You know, you just have that
<br />crossover, so during that crossover period, you know, you have really have a lack of parking
<br />stalls.
<br />Likewise, you know, at the surgical center what happens is that, you know, you have people who
<br />used to come in for outpatient appointments and, you know, in the past, they used to be
<br />scheduled maybe hour, hour and a half, but still then, you have some measure of overlap
<br />because, you know, you have people coming in to pick them up; others coming in for the next
<br />surgery. The victim of their success is that now they are a little more efficient so rather than
<br />doing maybe hour and a half or two hours per patient, they'll be able to do like half an hour to
<br />one hour and so, you know, gradually, it increases the level of service but, nevertheless, it
<br />compounds the parking problem.
<br />So, this is like, over the last I guess like eight years, what the Applicant and the landowner have
<br />been trying to do is best address this parking situation, and the problem has become over time
<br />again, because of the victim of success of the surgical center, it has become more of a problem.
<br />They had applied back in 2007 for the rezoning of the subject area, but unfortunately, that was
<br />denied—that was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and also the Planning
<br />Director, then Planning Director, went up to the County Council. The County Council had, for
<br />its own reason, did not act on that application. Essentially, denied—denied that application.
<br />In 2011, they reapplied. At that time when they reapplied, then I was contacted to see, you
<br />know, to assist them with the process, and so during that process in 2011, I tried to kind of like
<br />understand what the issues were, then reached out to, you know, particularly the neighboring
<br />5
<br />EXHIBIT C
<br />
|