September 28, 2016 DRAFT SC Minutes

Home

Industrial to Open and to revise the Open shoreline area along the coastline to be consistent with the Open area as shown in the current General Plan (2005) (but align the wavering boundary between the Open and LDU areas along he private road on the southern part of the point). Mr. Moniz moved to adopt Option 2 (revise the Open and Industrial areas in the proximity of Hokolou Point to be more consistent with the current Generol Plon (2005)) os presented in the September 10, 2016 Steering Committee meeting. Second by Mr. Carvalho. Additional discussion by the Steering Committee ed to a friendly amendment to the initial motion. Mr. Moniz moved to odd o friendly amendment to his previous motion — to align the wavering boundary between the Open and LDU areas along the private rood on the southern port of the point. Second by Mr. Carvalho. Original amended motion foiled with 3 votes aye and 2 votes nay. The Steering Committee needed 5 affirmative votes for the motion to carry and so, after further discussion, it was clear the committee was unable to agree on an option for Hakalau. It was decided that the Planning team would research new options for moving forward and consult with Corporation Council prior to the next Steering Committee meeting. qw b. Map adjustments in Pauka'a: Option 1 is to maintain the January 2016 Draft CDP agricultural designation for parcel 2-7-003:024, and Option 2 would designate parcel 2- 7-003:024 as LDU. (Note: Earlier testimony provided from Marissa Harman from Kamehameha Schools clarified that the initial request for consideration also meant to include parcel 2-7-003:025 in the LDU.) The Steering Committee discussed both options at length and also asked Kamehameha Schools representative, Allen Salavea, to clarify the intentions of the landowner, Kamehameha Schools, in their request to designate parcels 2-7-003:024 and 2-7- 003:025 as LDU. Mr. Salavea clarified that the intention is not to develop residential density in this area, but to allow flexibility to develop housing options, perhaps on a lease basis, for agricultural worker housing near their agricultural holdings. Discussions centered on parcel 2-7-003:025 being a large coastal parcel and parcel 2-7- 003:024 being highly visible to Highway 19. Concerns were raised that residential development of these parcels would impact the open area viewsheds and visually not provide a distinct rural 'break' between the residential areas of Pauka'a and Papa'ikou. Consideration was also given to the fact that another planning tool, besides the CDP policy map and LUPAG, could likely be used to achieve the landowner's objective of providing agricultural housing, without designating the entire parcels as LDU. Page 114