My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
20070710 KVDC Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2007
>
20070710 KVDC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2016 1:43:03 PM
Creation date
10/25/2016 1:43:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Commissioners emphasized the importance of the site, as it is one of the few places <br />in Kailua-Kona that are dedicated to King Umi and is very historical. Ms. Johnson also <br />confirmed that there will be an interpretive sign. <br /> <br />The Commissioners expressed their concern about the view plain from both mauka and <br />makai, and pointed out that the architectural design doesn’t exhibit anything unique to <br />Hawaii, and that they would like to see some sense of the village’s tradition and culture <br />weaved into the design. Ms. Johnson responded that overall they did want to and try to <br />use Hawaiian theme, but at the same time they also wanted to introduce something new <br />to the area. Some suggestions were made by the Commissioners as to how they could <br />add a more Hawaii feel to the design: Eliminate the third story; use hip roofs on the <br />projections on the stair towers, rather than open gables; incorporate Hawaiian pitch break <br />roofs into the design; improve the appearance of the open gable roof facing Kuakini <br />Highway; use more wood instead of stucco. The Commissioners recognized wood is not <br />as durable as stucco. Ms. Pattamatta said they could consider materials that look like <br />wood with better durability. <br /> <br />The Commissioners asked about the parking allocation, and Ms. Johnson answered that <br />each unit will have one assigned parking space and the rest will be shared. The <br />Commissioners expressed their concern saying that parking is a big problem, and Ms. <br />Johnson responded emphasizing that the project is more pedestrian friendly in that the <br />location enables the residents to walk to shops, restaurants and even to work in some <br />cases. <br /> <br />The Commission at this time concluded the discussion on this item. No action was taken due to <br />a lack of quorum. <br /> <br />Mr. Ron Aronson from the public spoke up, saying that he understands the frustration of the <br />commissioners when they don’t have a quorum, as he has been on the Commission in the past; <br />however, he wants to encourage the commissioners to make every effort to attend meetings and <br />to arrive on time in consideration of applicants and the public. <br /> <br />It was agreed by all in attendance that both matters be considered as Unfinished Business items <br />at the next meeting, which is scheduled for July 24, 2007. <br /> <br />The Chair stated that if the applicant is willing to entertain the recommendations made by the <br />Commissioners today and if it is possible for them to make those adjustments to the current plans <br />within the time frame, the Commission can consider those changes at the next meeting. <br /> <br />ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS <br />1. Minutes of the Meeting of May 29, 2007 <br /> This item was automatically continued to the next meeting due to a lack of quorum. <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.