My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-06 Hearing Transcript - Robert & Carol Oshiro REZ 16-208
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-10-06 Hearing Transcript - Robert & Carol Oshiro REZ 16-208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2016 8:20:21 AM
Creation date
11/4/2016 8:19:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HENKEL: I think you would include in the motion the amendment that you wish, and I think <br />you could refer to it as read by the planner. <br />CLARKSON: I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council on <br />the application for Change of Zone, Docket No. REZ 16-208 based on the Planning Director's <br />recommendation and filings as amended for Condition—F? <br />MIYASATO: G. <br />CLARKSON: G? <br />KAY: G. <br />CLARKSON: As amended for Conditionas, for Condition G with the language, the pro rata <br />language that we just heard from the Planning Department staff <br />HENKEL: Thank you. Is there a second to that motion? <br />IKEDA: I'll second. <br />KAY: If I may clarify just one thing, the Condition G that is in the proposed ordinance before <br />you right now for Oshiro adds in that 10 -foot future widening strip subdivided and dedicated to <br />the County prior to Certificate of Occupancy, and then it goes into the provision of those <br />improvements. AreI don't want toI'm just wondering, we're not—we don't want to replace <br />that, the provision or the requirement of the 10 -foot road widening strip to be dedicated, so are <br />we just adding the contents of the language of Condition G after that? <br />HENKEL: Right, instead of <br />CLARKSON: —That was my intention, yeah <br />HENKEL: instead of on occupancy it would be pro rata. <br />KAY: Well the <br />CLARKSON: —You know— <br />KAY: Pardon me, the provision of that 10 -foot future road widening strip dedicated to the <br />County, the language in this condition says prior to certificate of occupancy. The other language <br />about doing the improvements is also prior to certificate of occupancy, but that's all on the same <br />condition. <br />CLARKSON: My intention in making the motion was that the subdivision and dedication <br />language remain --only that the improvements be delayed until such time that Public Works <br />10 <br />EXHIBIT C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.