My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-06 Hearing Transcript - Robert & Carol Oshiro REZ 16-208
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-10-06 Hearing Transcript - Robert & Carol Oshiro REZ 16-208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2016 8:20:21 AM
Creation date
11/4/2016 8:19:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
We also have in the Recommendation Report, there is in our General Plan a direction to widen <br />and provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements along Kilauea Avenue from Haihai Street <br />to Ponahawai Street, so that's again kind of our purpose for putting those in with the <br />understanding that the County Council has the authority to change or add a condition later on <br />should they decide to do so. <br />HENKEL: Okay, thank you. Mr. Clarkson? <br />CLARKSON: I'm still somewhat confused about this whole thing. The Condition G requires <br />the subdivision of ten feet. Dedication—it doesn't say who to dedicate to but presumably to the <br />County, and then description of improvements. Isdo these improvements mean that for this, in <br />front of the subject parcel, Kilauea will be improved to whatever its future improvement would <br />look like? Are they going to basically widen Kilauea road? Put in sidewalk, curbs, and gutters? <br />And so for however many hundred feet it is for this one acre parcel, Kilauea will be widened? <br />KAY: If the improvements are done prior to occupancy, that's correct. <br />NISHIMURA: And, I'd like to point out that it would be the only parcel that has that <br />improvement currently in that block between Kahaopea Street and Puainako Street. You know, <br />and that, in my mind, it presents an issue of safety because, you know, you're gonna have a short <br />section of the road that's wider than every place else. <br />HENKEL: So, to clarify in my mind, you're asking us to amend Condition G toto defer that <br />until the County widens the whole area or includes the whole area rather? <br />NISHIMURA: That would be the Applicant's preference. And, again, you know, they are <br />willing to pay their fair share, whatever the pro rata share is determined to be at the time that the <br />County moves ahead with those improvements. <br />HENKEL: Okay. <br />CLARKSON: So, is this—is this a relatively new procedure? I mean, I'm aware of requiring <br />setbacks. For example, there was a setback on the previous application from a prior activity so <br />that no buildings or other improvements could encroach on an area that might be later <br />condemned and—and by the County and made into a roadway surface. But, now, in this <br />application, a condition is being made to actually improve the roadway to its final width rather <br />than just allow for that possibility at a future date. <br />KAY: That's correct, and this is consistent, again, with the Iida—with the other application that <br />we heard before. We passed it out of this Planning Commission with that condition in place, and <br />at Council, they decided to change it. We could at the—at the desire of the Commission come <br />up with some language to try and send it up that way, but we're just again staying consistent with <br />what we've done before. Again, based on what we heard, a commentary from Public Works and <br />also given our requirements in our General Plan. <br />5 <br />EXHIBIT C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.