My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-06 Hearing Transcript - Council Bill 228 (Hilo Medical Center REZ 14-175)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-10-06 Hearing Transcript - Council Bill 228 (Hilo Medical Center REZ 14-175)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2016 8:38:08 AM
Creation date
11/4/2016 8:37:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ordinance No. 95-33 required the following rezoning conditions be implemented. Twenty <br />Podocarpus plants were planted instead of the original 81 six-foot plants depicted on the <br />landscaping plan for our privacy/exhaust mitigation in a continuous, unbroken line along the <br />northeastern boundary of the project, including the Puna boundary of the subject property. <br />The privacy planting screen for Mrs. Gushiken's home was cut in 2012. They died and they <br />have never been replaced. She has no privacy. <br />A four -foot chain link fence was installed along the boundaries—that northeastern boundary of <br />the subject property for PPB. Of Enomoto's, Yamauchi's and Reis' properties, instead of the <br />required black vinyl coated six-foot chain link fence. <br />The no vehicular access planting screen easement was never planted across the Puna boundary of <br />the subject property. Each a violation of no access from or to Punahele as required by Final <br />Subdivision Plan and Ordinance 95-33. <br />The deed for this no vehicular access planting screen was required to have been filed before the <br />Final Subdivision Approval. I haven't found a record of its filing with the Bureau of <br />Conveyances as of last week. <br />Haitsuka Brothers baseyard, Loeffler Construction, and other independent truckers, Concept <br />Construction, etc., County and State inspectors, visitors, vendors, government inspectors, and <br />anyone used the subject property from 1994 as an access to and from Punahele Street that <br />continued to the completion of rehab in approximately 1997 when the first certificates of <br />occupancy were issued. Even though 95-33, enacted in March of 1995, prohibited this use as an <br />access point. The rough total of trips by Haitsuka vehicles, including machinery, the various <br />truckers, deliveries is at least around 25,000 plus, and each is a violation of that access to <br />Punahele Street. <br />The subject property then began its use as a parking lot after being cleared of vegetation and first <br />used as is. Later, gravel was installed and parking spaces marked with paint. HCC ACO's, <br />attorneys, social workers, and other State officials, visitors, inmates, and anyone including <br />HENKEL: Ms. Reis? <br />REIS, C.: Yes? <br />HENKEL: Could you please wrap it up because your time is up? <br />REIS, C.: Okay, thank you. Well, you have a copy of that and you can see from, what I'm <br />trying to say as far as we're concerned. <br />We are still trying to recover our good, old neighborhood that Nancy Cabral characterized this as <br />the desire for a quiet neighborhood is a lost dream in testimony before the 2007 Planning <br />10 <br />EXHIBIT F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.