My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-11 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-10-11 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 10:06:02 AM
Creation date
11/10/2016 10:05:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tucker: Yes I'm happy to. May I ask a question about procedure before <br /> Chair? Now my petition was filed on September 19 and this is <br /> now October 11. I have not had the benefit of seeing a written <br /> responses from a...the respondent. <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: So Madame Chair as a procedural matter...all documents that are <br /> received by the Board are confidential until it's presented in an <br /> open hearing so today is that open hearing. So what I recommend <br /> to the Board is that the Board make a motion to receive the <br /> response letter dated September 27, 2016 received from the <br /> Department of Public Works...to accept and file that and make that <br /> part of the record and then at that point that response letter can be <br /> provided to the petitioner as well as a letter from Daniel Lee <br /> response which is undated, but received on October 6, 2016. 1 <br /> believe that should be in you packet as well Board members. No? <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Do I hear a motion? <br /> Mr. Goodenow: So moved here Madame Chair. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Second. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Seconded. Alright any discussion in regards to that specific <br /> motion? <br /> Mr. Adams: I'll just ask one question. When is the appropriate time in this <br /> process...we have...we're receiving the petition and then we have <br /> testimony. At what point is it...we do this now...do we do this as <br /> part of the discussion. What's the normal course...normal part of <br /> the process where we're receiving the additional correspondence? <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: In terms of receiving the correspondence...that needs to be again <br /> presented to the Board at an open hearing which is today...and <br /> therefore at that point then the other party in this case the petitioner <br /> can receive that copy. That's per our rules so I do recommend that <br /> we do that now. That way the petitioner can receive the response <br /> from the respondents. <br /> Mr. Adams: Hence forth as far as our normal part of our procedure we should <br /> be receiving any correspondence that is attached to the petition. <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: Right...so you should have the response letter dated September 27, <br /> 2016 in your packet as well behind that is also the other response <br /> that was received on October 6 so it's...Board members if you <br /> could check and see. <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.