My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-11 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-10-11 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 10:06:02 AM
Creation date
11/10/2016 10:05:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
83(a)(3)...all persons shall be treated in a courteous, fair and <br /> impartial manner. Giving us then the dictionary definitions for fair <br /> and impartial. As I look as this and then I reviewed the plan <br /> review comments letters that were included...and then I looked at <br /> the notes with Mr. Daniel Lee...I was trying to find out where in <br /> here...where in any of those documents was anything that talked to <br /> unfair and not being impartial...where was that included in the <br /> documents? <br /> Mr. Tucker: The process itself is intended to supply one letter of corrections <br /> and one response as an expeditious treatment of all building <br /> permits. So by expanding it out to multiple letters and multiple <br /> request and by statements made to Mr. Lee in these two meetings <br /> that the notations are there along the lines of well you should be <br /> building with wood...we understand wood...we don't like this <br /> metal stuff...why are you doing this. That act actually was moving <br /> into what could be called restraint of trade where you're favoring <br /> one method of construction and one building material supplier over <br /> another. And...I'm not trying to sit here and argue about the <br /> intentions of the code as far as it's been adopted under 2006 <br /> IBC...but the process itself just went off the rails and I don't think <br /> that our treatment under the code and procedures of the building <br /> department was equal and impartial to the intended in general <br /> procedure. <br /> Mr. Adams: When you say equal and...it was not equal and impartial...are you <br /> assuming fair and impartial? <br /> Mr. Tucker: Right. <br /> Mr. Adams: That's usually relative to other situations...right...in other words <br /> not...what are you...what are you making the relative nature of <br /> this procedure to? To some specific ideal? <br /> Mr. Tucker: I guess specifically what I would say if a plan checker should do a <br /> corrections letter...he should thoroughly go through the <br /> plan...make a thorough list of corrections...submit it for...back to <br /> the applicant and then take in the response. That process was <br /> abandoned and it was done piecemeal over the course of ten <br /> months. Now additional since then...while we have...I had the <br /> burden of meeting the County's burden of..being required <br /> engineering which is an usual moment over the past fifty years for <br /> single family single story home and we met that burden by <br /> producing engineering as requested. I have come across evidence <br /> of which I'd like to submit if may that would demonstrate that Mr. <br /> Lee himself as a structural engineer working for the County...was <br /> 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.