Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Committee is sending a letter to the County about this matter and asked for the support of <br />the Action Committee. It will be placed on the agenda for the Action Committee meeting <br />in November. She also indicated that the Traffic Safety Committee is sending a letter to <br />Mayor Kenoi requesting immediate extension of Paniolo Avenue northward through <br />Waikoloa Village utilizing County funds to connect to the new park facility in the work <br />force housing project area. <br /> <br /> There were no other subcommittee reports. <br /> <br /> Under old business, Mr. Dunlap reported that the County would soon begin <br />advertising to solicit applicants to fill vacancies on the Committee. <br /> <br /> The Committee then turned to new business. Mr. Brilhante stated that he wanted <br />the members to consider privilege issues before he reported regarding the status of the <br />legal opinion that had been requested by the Committee. After some discussion, the <br />Committee asked that Ms. Leithead-Todd report regarding the agreement reached <br />concerning the manner in which the Committee will be given the opportunity to comment <br />on pending applications that come before the Planning Department which involve <br />properties in the South Kohala District. The legal opinion matter would be taken up after <br />the report by Ms. Leithead-Todd. <br /> <br /> Ms. Leithead-Todd stated the Planning Department had accepted a suggestion <br />from the Committee’s representatives offered at a meeting held in September whereby <br />the Planning Department would advise the Chair (or another member of the Committee <br />designated by the Committee) concerning all discretionary applications and certain other <br />types of applications coming before the Planning Department which relate to property <br />within the South Kohala District. The notice would be accompanied by a description of <br />the application setting forth sufficient information to enable a Committee representative <br />to determine whether the Committee wished to give further consideration to the <br />application, and would be sent to the Committee representative at the same time the <br />Planning Department solicited comments on the application from other entities such as <br />County departments. If the Committee wished to further consider the application, <br />representatives of the Committee could examine the contents of the application file at the <br />Planning Department. If the Committee chose to do so, it could then include the matter <br />on the agenda for the next Committee meeting and agree as to what comments and/or <br />suggestions, if any, it wished to offer to the Planning Department, and the Planning <br />Department would consider any communication from the Committee submitted following <br />the meeting. The Committee would be given a relatively brief period to submit any such <br />communication following the meeting. Ms. Leithead-Todd then answered questions from <br />the Committee members regarding the contemplated arrangements and distributed a list <br />of the kinds of applications that the Planning Department receives with an indication of <br />which would be brought to the attention of the Committee. The Committee members <br />thanked Ms. Leithead-Todd for her explanation and for agreeing to have the Planning <br />Department work with the Committee in this fashion. <br /> <br /> The Committee then returned to the question of the request for a legal opinion <br /> <br /> <br />