My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
November 2, 2016 DRAFT with map
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Steering Committee
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
November 2, 2016 DRAFT with map
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2016 9:08:07 AM
Creation date
11/22/2016 9:07:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Working from review document #3, the CDP Planning Team facilitated a discussion by the Steering <br />Committee geared toward preliminary decisions about the following possible revisions to the Draft <br />CDP: <br />Pauka'a Mauka: Using the decision making tool the Steering Committee discussed the possible <br />extension of the Low Density Urban (LDU) designation to the north on the mauka side of Kulana <br />Street. <br />Mr. Carvalho moved to approve Option 2 of the Pauka'a Mauka Land Use Guide Map. Second <br />by Ms. Mendoza. Motion passed with 6 votes aye and 1 vote nay (Mr. Kurokawa). <br />"Option 2 of the Pauka'a Mauka Land Use Guide Map is attached to these minutes. <br />b. At this point, the Steering Committee was asked if there were any other land use guide maps to <br />reconsider and no additional map revisions were presented. <br />2. Consideration of Proposed Revisions to Draft CDP Land Use Policies: Mr. Agres reminded the <br />Steering Committee that they are working from "Review Document #3: Proposed Revisions & <br />Additions for the February 2016 Draft CDP" and briefly went over the process used at the October <br />22, 2016 meeting. Following that same process the CDP Planning Team facilitated a discussion by <br />the Steering Committee geared toward preliminary decisions about the following possible revisions <br />to the Draft CDP. <br />a. Section 5: Strengthen Infrastructure, Facilities, and Service%L__,o <br />s: <br />Revise County Action Policy 65 (Section 5.2 Expand Affordable Housing Options): Mr. <br />Kurokawa suggested adding additional language to CA Policy 65 requesting revisions to the <br />building code where it relates to the renovation of older houses. <br />Ms. Mendoza moved to approve County Action Policy 65 revisions as presented including <br />language to incorporate Mr. Kurokawa's suggestions. <br />The amended Policy 65 reads: <br />"Develop and implement a County -wide, cross -agency affordable housing plan. <br />■ ERee .r^ge Develop affordable housing options within existing towns and villages, near <br />services, and critical infrastructure. <br />Propose and support amendments to the County's taxing powers as a means to <br />increase the supply of affordable housing. <br />Revise the Zoning Code. Chanter 25. relating to 'Ohana Dwellings and develoo an <br />Accessory Dwelling Unit policy aimed at facilitating affordable housing and aging -in- <br />place opportunities. Evaluate and incorporate applicable policy criteria from City and <br />County of Honolulu's Chapter 21 ADU policy; see also www.accessorydwellings.org as <br />a resource for how other municiaalities are handling accessory dwelling unit <br />regulations. <br />■ Revise the building code requirements for renovating older houses to facilitate the <br />redevelopment of affordable housing." <br />Second by Mr. Kurokawa. Motion passed with 6 votes aye and 1 votes nay (Mr. Carvalho). <br />Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.