Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Sing: And then not notifying us of what you're considering in the <br /> hearing against our client....fundamental fairness. <br /> Mr. Adams: To say that you weren't prepared to have these conversations is <br /> one thing...but the idea that we are somehow a year and a half <br /> after this is come to the front and after you've gone through a trial <br /> that we're being unfair in asking these questions is beyond the pale <br /> to me so I just make that comment. <br /> Mr. Robinson: And I have to add to that. After all the times you were here <br /> previously...listened to us and I know you had to sit through a few <br /> other things. What did you expect us to do today? <br /> Mr. Sing: I'm not sure and that's part of the problem. <br /> Mr. Robinson: You just thought you're just going to come...we're gonna have <br /> lunch and then go home. I mean come on. <br /> Mr. Sing: I'm not sure why you would characterize in that fashion. We're <br /> here trying to be serious with you. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Well be serious. <br /> Mr. Sing: Well I am. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Respond. I mean why are you saying oh well that's not why we're <br /> here for an investigation or for investigatory hearing. <br /> Mr. Sing: Because your rules say that if we disagree with it then it's an <br /> investigatory hearing. <br /> Mr. Adams: I'd be interested actuually...because you said that twice now and <br /> you showing me where that is and you know I am wrong...I'm <br /> happy to admit it. <br /> Mr. Sing: If I could just have a second. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: No problem. <br /> Mr. Sing: I say that as a response to 4.7(b). <br /> Mr. Eddins: 4.8 is also applicable. <br /> Mr. Adams: That's fair. Okay. I see what you're saying. <br /> 31 <br />