My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-11-09 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-11-09 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2016 9:34:54 AM
Creation date
12/6/2016 3:52:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Adams: That would be...in my opinion and I would be interested in <br /> hearing Counsel on this. I believe that would require a subpoena <br /> to do that. <br /> Mr. Murai: Certainly, the parties may agree to appear and if there's no <br /> agreement or if Counsel's not prepared to commit to the client <br /> appearing then the Board could issue a subpoena. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Okay. One of the issues here...definitely is a time concern <br /> right...the timing because once the Mayor is not in office <br /> anymore...we have a very different ball game...a very different <br /> situation and so that is really you know one of the primary issues <br /> and was an issue right from the beginning you know with the trial <br /> and all of those things...but I would say...I really don't feel <br /> comfortable making a decision at this point and time with neither <br /> the petitioner nor the respondent being here and so a special <br /> meeting and investigative hearing...investigatory hearing I think <br /> you know would be one way for us to get to the bottom of...and <br /> have our questions answered which I expected them to be <br /> answered today to be perfectly frank. <br /> Mr. Robinson: And I agree because frankly I had some questions for Mr. Hyland <br /> as well and he's not even here. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Alright we have our Vice-Chair Goodenow joining us so can I just <br /> update him or would you like...why don't you go ahead and... <br /> Mr. Adams: So where we are Vice-Chair is that as a part of the conversation <br /> we've been having with the Mayor's representatives. It's been <br /> brought to my attention since I was the one who was arguing it. <br /> That in fact sections in our rules...section 4.7 and 4.8 and 5 would <br /> indicate that due process according to our rules indicates that we <br /> would had a resolution indicating we were gonna have an <br /> investigatory hearing as a part of our infonnal hearing. We have <br /> not done that...their absolutely correct in that regard. Unless we <br /> decide to either continue or dismiss...I have put forward a motion <br /> indicating that we will at some point in November...date to be <br /> determined that has to be determined before the end of this <br /> meeting. Hold such a hearing with notice to both...to all parties. <br /> So that's where we are at the moment...in the middle of discussion <br /> of a motion that I made and member Robinson seconded. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Alright. Thank you and again I'm really sorry. If it weren't for <br /> my obligations to the courthouse...I would have stayed. Thank <br /> you. <br /> 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.