My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-11-09 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-11-09 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2016 9:34:54 AM
Creation date
12/6/2016 3:52:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. O'Dell: I'm going to assume it's by purchasing. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Purchasing right...purchasing department....but it is a sealed <br /> bid...right...lowest bid wins. <br /> Ms. O'Dell: Yes. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: That's how it works. Alright thank you. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Go ahead. What's the pleasure of the Board? <br /> Mr. Robinson: I just motion that there's no finding of...no conflict of interest. <br /> Mr. Adams: I would second that. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Do we have any further discussion? <br /> Mr. Adams: Yes. So back in August...we had petition 2016-12. I believe we <br /> moved on that as well and found a no conflict of interest...no <br /> violation of conflict of interest in that particular petition. That was <br /> a different department so that's probably why you're coming back <br /> was because of the department difference given what we had said <br /> in the previous finding...right. <br /> Ms. O'Dell: Correct. <br /> Mr. Adams: Okay. So we should in my opinion we should make sure that our <br /> findings include the discussion that this is...regarding this <br /> particular division within the department with the understanding <br /> that she is...her position as administrator is a separate division <br /> within the same department...but there is no connection between <br /> the work that's to be done that's being bid on in that division and <br /> her division. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: I think that's a good...because this is a new law right and we're <br /> just kind of trying to wrap our sense around it and so in this case <br /> that's a good.point to make. Thank you very much. Do we have <br /> any further discussion? If not, I'll call for the questions...all in <br /> favor say aye....any oppose? That motion is carried. Thank you <br /> very much. <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.