Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TAX BOARD OF REVIEW <br />MEETING MINUTES <br />Appeal Hearings <br />Wednesday, September 21, 2016 <br />West Hawaii Civic Center <br />Department of Liquor Conference Room <br />Kailua-Kona, Hawaii <br /> <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />Chairman Donald David called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. <br /> <br />Present were: Board Members Donald David, Grace Reinhard, Wesley Takai, Melvin Ventura and <br />Richard Dinges; Deputy Corporation Counsel Belinda Castillo Hall; Real Property Tax Administrator <br />Stanley Sitko, Acting Real Property Tax Assistant Administrator Keita Jo and Real Property Appeals <br />Board Clerk Elizabeth Nina Swain. <br /> <br /> <br />STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC <br /> <br />There were no statements from the public. <br /> <br /> <br />TAX APPEAL CASE HEARINGS <br /> <br />Note: <br /> <br />Prior to the start of the case hearings, Deputy Corporation Counsel Belinda Castillo Hall advised all <br />Appellants and the Department of the procedure the Board would be following for the rendering of <br />their decision, and the Appellants’ further right to appeal to the Tax Appeal Court located in Honolulu <br />within 30 days from the date of the decision letter that the appellant will be receiving via certified mail. <br /> <br />For each appeal case, the appraiser submitted a packet of information to the Board, unless there had <br />been a prior settlement with the Appellant or withdrawal. If the Appellant was not present, any <br />information sent in by the Appellant was presented to the Board along with the appraisers’ packet. <br /> <br />CASE #25316 – YAKOBOVICH TRST, WILLIAM/VICTORIA <br />TMK 6-2-013-013-0010 <br /> <br />Appellant was not present. It was noted for the record that the notice of hearing was delivered to the <br />appellant on September 6, 2016. <br /> <br />Present for the County was appraiser Matthew Radmilovic. <br /> <br />Property located in the Wai’ula’ula Development in the Mauna Kea Resort. <br /> <br />Appeal on building value. <br /> <br />County presented their case together with any and all information provided by the appellant. County <br />recommended sustaining the values. A call for questions was made. <br /> <br />