My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
October 22, 2016 FINAL SC Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Steering Committee
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
October 22, 2016 FINAL SC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2016 12:59:09 PM
Creation date
12/27/2016 12:58:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
center. Third, the ag center that has been proposed to you by the landowner is speculative at <br />most. It has been speculative on the landowner for many occasions when he has submitted <br />plans for luxury houses on the view — on the shoreline, that was speculative. When he <br />submitted plans for a brewery and a distillery, that is still speculative and its speculative now <br />about this ag center as well. And finally, when Michael who just testified, testified about the <br />third — about all these new warehouses that are going to be built, if you read — if you read what <br />the landowner has even suggested for this, they are containers in many occasions. He says <br />Matson containers. So, in summary, I would just simply — quickly again say look at the CDP, look <br />at the policies, objectives of the CDP, remember in your head where we're talking about and it's <br />not a close call. Thank you. <br />5. Dong Guo, representing farmers and speaking on agenda item 3, Hakalau Point: For everyone, <br />yeah, thank you. My name is Dong. I working and living in Hakalau around — about 20 years so <br />I know Hakalau, this community. I get friends — plenty friends over there. I know plenty farmers <br />living and working in Hakalau — this place. And I know now, for farmers we need one processing <br />plant for processing our product and then send to Mainland. So, you know when we talking <br />about the soju plant, for sweet potato soju plant in Honolulu, when people from [inaudible] <br />come to Honolulu set up very — very — very small plant. I seen my year, they just processing <br />30,000 pounds potatoes [inaudible] potatoes [inaudible] thousand dollars. But our processing <br />this soju, even the [inaudible] market just some customer or some traveler come for buy the <br />sales from $30, in Korea its $200,000. Only three — thirty thousand potatoes processed into soju <br />and they send to market and bring back twenty — $200, 000 sales. So, we looking for some <br />chance like that. We need Hakalau — this industrial area, keep industrial zoning and the — set up <br />the soju plant right away. That's what I thinking so we need a building and they get power, <br />water, everything ready —just ready for set up. Okay. Thank you. <br />6. Steve Shropshire, representing himself, speaking on agenda item 3, Hakalau Point Map: Thank <br />you for the opportunity to testify. First off, I want to say that I empathize with this Committee <br />in terms of being able to sort out all the rhetoric and all the agendas that people bring to these <br />— this process. And, I — I would simply also point to the wall and say that the project we're <br />proposing matches consistently with the third tier of the economic development tier of this plan. <br />What's unique about this property is that it's zoned industrial. One — less than one-tenth of all <br />the land on the island of Hawaii is zoned industrial. Very, very rare commodity. So, it gives us <br />an opportunity to support the goals that have been identified in the economic development <br />plan. There's also goals, Mr. Cain mentioned Objective 4 and 5, 1 think both of those goals talk <br />about —in the five, direct future settlement patterns towards existing developments, creating <br />walkable mixed-use neighborhoods and that's clearly what we're trying to do, bring services <br />back. People talk about the plantation days. What made the plantation days great? The <br />economics of the plantation created jobs. It created a — created a economy and I would simply <br />ask you to think about that and the need for that in terms of what we've already identified. <br />Moving — there's only four things that can happen here. One is that we're able to negotiate a <br />settlement with PONC that's acceptable to me as a landowner. That doesn't look possible or <br />probable at this point. I don't have anything that's tangible in front of me. Number two, the <br />community works together with the developer. We create a shared vision that has elements of <br />the park plan, if it has also economic development objectives. Third, I go it alone. We fi — we <br />Page 113 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.