My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
October 22, 2016 FINAL SC Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Steering Committee
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
October 22, 2016 FINAL SC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2016 12:59:09 PM
Creation date
12/27/2016 12:58:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
rating and the other half, the Open. Now we've agreed, my wife and I to do this after much <br />discussion and constructive input from Ms. Gloor and that reinforces my written communication <br />to the Committee. Time? Okay. There are five other pieces of property organized the way I <br />requested the Committee to do ours. Thank you very much. <br />2. Michael Johnson, representing Ono Gardens on the agenda item of Hakalau Point: Hi, my <br />name is Michael Johnson and I thank the Committee for their time and their value and <br />considering all the public's points of view on all these topics. Today, I'm talking about Hakalau <br />Point 3 Option 4C to leave blank with no CDP recommendation for these parcels of land. And <br />I've been — have an ongoing survey and petition that says the same thing and we all, 52 of us <br />that have signed this so far, wish for this option, Option 4C, leave it blank, with no CDP <br />recommendation. We've had 24 people from Hakalau, 11 from Hdmdkua Coast, 17 more from <br />around the island. Twenty-four of these people are farmers and more and more farmers and <br />farm -related economically people want to see this land remain industrial because it represents <br />opportunity for the economy, opportunity for the economy for good paying jobs and opportunity <br />for a lot of us farmers to not have to go to Hilo for our services. We can go right to Hakalau. I <br />live in Hakalau myself. Then, breaking it down further, 10 of these people wanted ag food <br />processing and a commercial kitchen. Eight of them wanted to see it just remain industrial for <br />different reasons and 14 of them wanted either an agricultural park or ag tourism, brewery, a <br />restaurant and demo —farm demonstrations, food demonstrations, interpretive demonstrations <br />for Hawaiian plants also. So, this whole thing is gathering a lot of interest in the community and <br />there's a lot of points of view that can all come together to make this land a great opportunity <br />to give our coast here — our Hdmdkua Coast a boost, economically which is what we all really <br />need. Everybody wanted a — good paying jobs. So, I've turned in the petition thus far with 52 <br />names on it and for further review and I'm still just getting started. There's a lot of people that I <br />haven't talked to. It's getting easier and easier to talk to on this topic and get people to sign the <br />petition. Okay. Thank you. <br />3. John Kaye, representing himself on the agenda item of Hakalau Point: Hi, I've spoken on this <br />issue several times and I did send a written testimony in advance and I hope you have that so <br />I'm not going to dwell on that a lot. I just want to point out what I think is really important in <br />terms of the Steering Committee and why we're all here today and the purpose of the Steering <br />Committee is to make land use recommendations and I believe those recommendations then go <br />to the Planning Department. The Planning Department then reviews them, tests them for legal <br />sufficiency to see if it's — if everything's ok and then, they make their decisions. I don't think <br />that the — that the Steering Committee has the ultimate decision on any land use designation at <br />this point. The other thing that I would like to point out, that is in doing that, my understanding <br />of the CDP has been that we're looking at a very broad, looking at a very general thing, saying <br />what do we want to have the Hdmdkua area look like for the next ten years. We are not being <br />concerned with any particular — particular parcel or property and whether we'd like to see a <br />carnival on that piece of property for the future, whether we'd like to see a restaurant on that <br />property for the future, a park on the property for the future, any particular — particular use <br />because that is a Planning Department function and that is not the Steering Committee's <br />function. And, one of the reasons I think that's true is that's speculative, it's highly speculative <br />as to whether you would end up with an ag center on that piece of property or a park on that <br />Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.