My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-12-01 Hearing Transcript - Edward Torrison REZ 16-213
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-12-01 Hearing Transcript - Edward Torrison REZ 16-213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2017 8:12:25 AM
Creation date
1/6/2017 8:12:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
commercial operation of any type that could be built on this property, if it were to be rezoned, <br />would be to just add one more aggravation to the neighborhood that's already kind of in a less <br />than quiet and peaceful situation as it is. Why add to their burden? <br />So, those are my reasons, and I made the motion. <br />HENKEL: Okay, there's been a motion for an unfavorable recommendation. Is there a second? <br />IKEDA: I second. <br />HENKEL: It's been moved by Commissioner Clarkson and seconded by Commissioner Ikeda. <br />Discussion, please? <br />MOSES: Yeah, I just want to add to what Commissioner Clarkson just shared. I think with the <br />presentation that you, you gave, Zendo, and the effort that you and Mr. Torrison made with the <br />members of the community to try to come together, appreciate that. But, in your own words, you <br />stated that regardless of what it is that you intend to do with that they are in opposition, and so <br />even though that you downsized the building and the structure and all of that, I believe that they <br />are still feeling the same way. <br />And, I agree with Commissioner Clarkson's reasons that although it meets every criteria to <br />approve as the Planning Department has recommended, the Planning Director's <br />recommendation, it does have a factor of bearing the impact it has on the neighborhood. It has in <br />the past for me, and it continues to do so. So, like Commissioner Clarkson—yes, there is that. <br />That is a conflict, and I will also vote in that way. Thank you. <br />HENKEL: Any other comments or discussion from the Commission? I'd like to say that, you <br />know, historically, I found that the Commission has, has been responsive to neighbors and <br />neighborhoods. You know, but having said that, to me, the biggest problem with the project and <br />the biggest concern seems to be traffic. And, yet, II agree with Zendo that just the nature of <br />the building, the limited number of parking spaces and available and no parking on Waianuenue <br />would, would just naturally eliminate, you know, a great deal of traffic for a business that <br />required a lot of traffic. So, I would tend to support the project, but is there any more <br />discussion? With that then, we'll do a roll call vote. <br />DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The motion before us is an unfavorable <br />recommendation based on the reasons stated on the record. With that, we'll take the roll call. <br />Commissioner Clarkson? <br />CLARKSON: Aye. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Ikeda? <br />IKEDA: Aye. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Dela Cruz? <br />EXHIBIT D <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.