My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-09-28 BDHRA Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Banyan Drive HRA
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
2016-09-28 BDHRA Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2017 2:45:44 PM
Creation date
1/24/2017 2:45:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
discussion with the State. The Mayor has directed me to work with the leaseholder to get <br />this MOU out and going so the County can allocate our resources. Basically what it is, is <br />what testimony you heard today. It’s a clean-up of all the banyan trees. By the way, <br />most of those banyan‒‒almost all of the banyan trees are within the County right-of-way. <br />It’s not within the leasehold portion. Further to the Bayfront Trails component, their <br />representative was with us on that walking audit so we got a better idea of what they’re <br />thinking in terms of how they would implement some of their components. Let me see <br />what else. <br /> <br />DELIMA: I got some short questions. <br /> <br />KANUHA: I think that’s about it. <br /> <br />DELIMA: I think it’s important that everyone understands that the Naniloa lease which <br />includes the golf course is a long lease. How many years is that lease? I know it’s‒‒ <br /> <br />KANUHA: Fifty-five. <br /> <br />DELIMA: Okay so quite frankly, unless there’s a memorandum of agreement by the <br />leaseholder, none of the ideas of a convention or community project would be able to be <br />done unless for some reason they default on their lease. So I think it’s important for the <br />public to understand that having that land hold‒‒leaseholder cooperation is important in <br />order to implement anything in the short term. The other thing I wanted to comment was <br />if at all possible, I agree with Mr. Kubota about the idea of trying to, at least put as close <br />to the shoreline as possible, the trail aspect of it because I think he hits the nail on the <br />head by saying at least if you have it on your master plan that if at all possible they’ll try <br />to implement it. <br /> <br />KANUHA: Right, and that’s precisely the reason we left that green strip fronting all the <br />properties over there. <br /> <br />DELIMA: And then I like the idea of the common sense approach to the ice house and <br />the HELCO property. Quite frankly, it needs to be viable in order for the land owner to <br />be able to make use of their property. So I think that is a good solution for the long term <br />aspect of it. I’m not certain what HELCO wants to do with it, and I’m not certain what <br />the land owner for the ice house, but I think it’s important that the Planning Department <br />engage in some discussions, but I like the concept of at least giving those land owners <br />some value so that it doesn’t become blighted. If you don’t give them value, then it’s <br />going to be blighted. I think that was rather ingenious to be frank. And Mr. Inouye <br />asked a question about the‒‒originally the plan was where the Reed’s Bay Hotel all the <br />way to Country Club would be just park. Now under this revision it’s condo, mixed use. <br />So although they are all leases, the ability to have a condominium mixed use is still <br />available for the present structures? <br /> <br />Page 14 of 19 <br />Banyan Drive Hawai‘i Redevelopment Agency <br />September 28, 2016, Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.