My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Barney and Pam Elders
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Public Comment/Feedback on Draft Hamakua CDP
>
Barney and Pam Elders
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2017 3:21:57 PM
Creation date
1/30/2017 3:19:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
agriculture as stated by the CDP in Policy 5 above and Policy 4 below. There are several ways <br />the entire Kihalani Homestead can serve as an UGB (non -conforming Ag 20; Urban; Rural) <br />without having to be designated IAL. <br />3CI: THE CDP SAYS: NO RURAL IS PROPOSED BECAUSE KIHALANI <br />HOMESTEAD IS RURAL DE FACTO <br />The Hamakua Community Development Plan: Rationale Future Addendum To <br />dix Draft CDP Rationale, January 2016 states at page 37: <br />No LUPAG R uir ll aireas wire proposed -fair these it a,u t the pirevalleince of the a,uirr a,und in ist ing ruirall- <br />stylle paircellsfirm the homestead it (e.g., ainouvrali°olpae Hoirnestead IlIoad, HolkuirnaIhoe IlIoad, and IKlilhSIIainl <br />Hoirnestead IlIoad)„ <br />*COMMENT: This rationale seems to say that Kihalani Homestead cannot be considered for a <br />rural designation because it is de facto rural already. There are many reasons why Kihalani <br />Homestead and a rational land use policy would benefit from an official Rural designation for <br />Kihalani Homestead and the other homesteads on Hawaii Island. To begin with, Kihalani <br />Homestead is conceded to be rural by both the County and the CDP. The major issue with a <br />rural designation is that it might encourage 1 acre subdivisions of Kihalani Homestead which no <br />one on Kihalani Homestead Road would welcome. This possibility might be mitigated by <br />layering Ag -20 zoning over a Rural LUPAG; or by creating a new Agriculture sub -category: <br />see the idea at the conclusion to these comments. Regardless, it would make more sense to <br />apply the Rural designation to Kihalani Homesteads rather than an IAL designation which is <br />entirely inappropriate for the properties on Kihalani Homestead Road. The County's and CDP's <br />concession that Kihalani Homestead is rural should be the last nail in the coffin for the idea that <br />Kihalani Homestead should be designated IAL. <br />The 2005 General Plan states at sec. 14.1.1 <br />AGRICULTURAL DISTRICTS that have ea significant residential component. TYPICAL lot sizes wary from 9,000 - <br />square feet to two acres. These subdivisions may contain small formas, wood areas, and open fields as well as <br />residences. Allowable uses within these areas ... may include commercialcommunity and public facilities," <br />(emphasis added) <br />*COMMENT: This description makes it clear that the County has the authority to approve <br />Rural designations in agricultural zones; that existing subdivisions (like Kihalani Homestead) <br />that have rural uses are eligible to be designated rural; and that rural uses can be on State <br />Agricultural Districts as well as on Rural Districts. <br />3C2: CDP SAYS: THERE IS AN EXCESS OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN MAUKA <br />AGRICULTURE <br />*the CDP continues: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.