My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-01-05 Hearing Transcript - Rhodes Moore LLC USE 16-065
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-01-05 Hearing Transcript - Rhodes Moore LLC USE 16-065
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2017 12:22:43 PM
Creation date
2/1/2017 12:22:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
So, we have three options trying to accommodate it with the current easement or with some <br />changes that easement, them accepting to use our driveway and, and planned access as well as <br />whatever emergency access we have or an option to the south. The south would take some work <br />because there is a channel that goes through there that we would need to put a little, we'd put a <br />culvert on. <br />CLARKSON: I have one more concern. I noticed that the perimeter of the main building, it's <br />surrounded by parking and access roads, and there appears to be no landscaping designed into <br />the project to separate the project from the neighbor to the south and the subdivision across the <br />way to the east. I'm new here, but I've seen landscaping requirements to kind of buffer the <br />visual impact of commercial buildings in our activities in the six months I've been on the <br />Commission. I wonder if that would beoh, tell me, Maija, that it's in there already. <br />JACKSON: It is in there. Do you, do you want me to describe the landscaping that would be <br />required? <br />CLARKSON: I actually would because— <br />JACKSON: Yeah, it's not really shown on the plan. <br />CLARKSON: Okay. <br />JACKSON: So, the landscaping rule, the Planning Department landscaping rule requires that <br />they install buffer yard landscaping around the perimeter of the property, and that would be from <br />the ground to three feet high, completely solid, opaque. And, then from three feet high up to 20 <br />feet, it would be intermittent landscaping. So, you could see through it from 3 feet to 20 feet. <br />There would also be landscaping required for any parking areas so all along the perimeter of the <br />road where it's not up against a property line, that would require landscaping. There are <br />landscaping requirements for within the parking lots, and there are also landscaping requirements <br />for any like generators or air conditioning units, garbage disposal areas, loading zones. There's <br />additional landscaping for those areas as well. And, that is in Condition No. 5. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you. <br />JACKSON: You're welcome. <br />CLARKSON: How would that, how would that landscaping requirement be affected by the <br />easement, the driveway easement by the, along Kanoelehua. I mean, would there be any place <br />for any landscaping along the main highway there? <br />JACKSON: Well, I did talk to the Applicant, Mr. Yeh, this morning about, you know, I don't <br />know the legality of whether they can place landscaping within an access and utility easement, so <br />that's something that they'll have to consider. If it's not something they can do, then they would <br />need to provide landscaping outside of the easement, so possibly move this building east a little <br />EXHIBIT B <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.