Laserfiche WebLink
Harry Kim <br />Mayor <br />COWIN Of Pitt'Mi i <br />Wil Okabe <br />Managing Director <br />Barbara J. Kossaw <br />Deputy Managing Director <br />®ffrn of the Agin <br />25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2603 • Hilo, Hamar] 96720 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 961-6553 <br />KONA 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy., Bldg. C • Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 <br />(808)323-4444 • Fax (808) 323-4440 <br />February 28, 2017 <br />Senator Jill Tokuda <br />Ways and Means <br />Hawai'i State Capitol <br />Honolulu, HI 96813 <br />Dear Chair Tokuda and Members: <br />RE: SB 410 SD 1 <br />Relating to Collective Bargaining <br />Thank you for this opportunity to comment on SB 410, SD1. <br />SB 410, SD1 says its purpose is to "clarify" the allowable scope of collective <br />bargaining negotiations regarding the rights and obligations of a public employer, and <br />also "clarify" prohibited practices for parties to a public employment collective bargaining <br />agreement. However, as we read the bill, its provisions would take away rights of the <br />employer, and that is not acceptable. <br />As we read SB 410, SD1 it would provide a union another subject area to grieve, <br />by alleging that an action by the employer to implement affects the terms and conditions <br />of employment. So, the amendment does not clarify, it muddies the current bright line <br />of understanding between employer rights and employee rights. <br />It would remove from HRS 89- 9 "permissive subjects of bargaining" which <br />currently (1) are not mandatory, (2) are permissive and (3) are limited to 'procedures <br />and criteria.' HRS 89-9 properly recognizes "permissive subjects of bargaining"; there is <br />no duty to bargain, and a party cannot be compelled to bargain on permissive subjects. <br />County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer <br />