My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Recomended Hāmākua CDP Policy Rationale
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Hamakua CDP Draft Documents
>
HCDP Recommended Draft Documents for Agency Review
>
Recomended Hāmākua CDP Policy Rationale
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2017 8:48:50 AM
Creation date
3/15/2017 8:46:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Areas that are clearly beyond the designated urban growth boundaries shall be preserved as rural or agricultural <br />lands to maintain open space, scenic view planes, and natural beauty areas. <br />Note: See Policy 6 for more information on Industrial areas. <br />This policy clarifies that the urban growth boundary established with the Hamakua CDP Land Use Guide Map <br />establishes parcel -specific UGBs whenever practical at the intersection between Urban and Rural/Agricultural land <br />uses. The CDP strategy of designating parcel -specific Urban designations adds clarity and specificity, increases <br />transparency into the land use designation process, and more accurately reflects the County's and the Community's <br />land use goals and intentions. <br />Rationale: The Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) identifies areas where growth will be encouraged and areas that are <br />to be protected for agriculture. UGBs are intended to accommodate anticipated growth and to separate areas <br />appropriate for future residential development from areas intended for agricultural use. This is sometimes referred <br />to as "Town and Country' zoning, which requires that development occur only in towns and villages, with the <br />surrounding rural areas remaining undeveloped and available for farming, forestry, natural area preservation, and <br />recreation. The LUPAG map includes land use categories that effectively establish an UGB between the agricultural <br />categories (Orchard, Extensive Agriculture, and Important Agriculture), the rural category, and the urban categories <br />(Low, Medium, and High Density Urban, Industrial, Urban Expansion, and Resort). This policy clarifies that the UGB <br />established with the Hamakua CDP Land Use Guide Map establishes parcel specific UGBs whenever practical. <br />This strategy of moving toward parcel -specific mapping for the Hamakua CDP Land Use Guide Map reflects a shift <br />from the 2005 General Plan's LUPAG direction of being generalized guidance. (See the rationale for Policy 1 for a <br />further discussion of the General Plan LUPAG). As noted, the LUPAG maps were originally broad, flexible tools <br />intended to guide the direction and types of desirable growth for each area of the County. This general approach to <br />guiding land use and growth allowed for interpretive flexibility and was based, at least in part, on the challenges of <br />creating detailed maps specific enough to demonstrate land use designations at a parcel level. <br />However, by allowing general, 'blob' style LUPAG maps, parcels were often split into various LUPAG designations in <br />ways that were more arbitrary than they were intentional. This, at times, led to property owners desiring clearer <br />direction about their land use designations and future development options and led some property owners to seek <br />further Planning Department interpretations of their property in relation to the general LUPAG designations. <br />Now that the CDPs have the opportunity and the technology to easily and efficiently create parcel -specific LUPAG <br />maps, it is a more proactive planning strategy to clearly articulate LUPAG designations in the Hamakua CDP at a <br />parcel level and decrease the prevalence of splitting LUPAG designations arbitrarily. <br />A compelling reason for an exception to this approach would be when part of a parcel is in an Open LUPAG <br />designation (such as when part of a parcel is within the State Land Use Conservation district — e.g., along the <br />coastline or in mauka forests). Any part of a parcel that is designated as LUPAG Open would remain Open for that <br />specific area of the parcel. Other exceptions to this parcel -specific strategy would be when the parcel is large and <br />may need to reflect two (or more) different types of LUPAG designations. For example, when the parcel borders a <br />town where part of it would be within the urban growth boundary, and yet the large parcel stretches farther into <br />agricultural areas where an Agricultural designation is appropriate. <br />The CDP strategy of using parcel -specific LUPAG designations when possible, adds clarity, specificity, and increases <br />transparency into the land use designation process and more accurately reflects the County's and the Community's <br />land use goals and intentions. <br />151 Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.