My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Recomended Hāmākua CDP Policy Rationale
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Hamakua CDP Draft Documents
>
HCDP Recommended Draft Documents for Agency Review
>
Recomended Hāmākua CDP Policy Rationale
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2017 8:48:50 AM
Creation date
3/15/2017 8:46:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LUPAG guidance could trump the Hamakua CDP Official Land Use Map' recommendations. See Policy 1 for a review <br />of the various Hamakua CDP LUPAG designations. The Factors are further discussed here: <br />1. Factor 1: Minimize new coastal development. This first factor used in evaluating LUPAG designations is <br />based on Community Objective #1, which states: <br />"Protect, restore, and enhance watershed ecosystems, sweeping views, and open spaces from mauka <br />forests to makai shorelines, while assuring responsible public access for recreational, spiritual, cultural, and <br />sustenance practices." <br />To further this objective in guiding development, a review of the current land uses and designations in <br />coastal areas was performed and changes are being recommended in areas not yet developed but have <br />LUPAG designations that guide future development to this coastal area. Recommendations are made in <br />these undeveloped coastal areas to protect the shoreline as open space and priority viewsheds whenever <br />possible. Examples of this can be seen in the proposed changes to Papa'ikou, Pepe'ekeo, Hakalau, and <br />'O'okala. See also Policy 2. <br />2. Factor 2: Minimize encroachment onto agricultural lands. This second factor used in evaluating LUPAG <br />designations is based on Community Objective #2 which states: <br />"Protect and restore viable agricultural lands and resources. Protect and enhance viewscapes and open <br />spaces that exemplify Hdmdkua's rural character." <br />To further this objective in guiding development, a review of the current land uses and designations on <br />agricultural lands near urban areas was performed and changes are being recommended in areas where the <br />current LUPAG guidance allows for urban encroachment on productive agricultural lands. <br />Recommendations for the urban -to -agriculture interface are intended to keep larger and potentially <br />productive agricultural lands for agricultural uses and to guide residential or rural -residential mixes within or <br />adjacent to urban areas. This strategy results in smaller LUPAG LDU areas in most towns. <br />Another strategy being employed in the new LUPAG recommendations is to accommodate rural <br />development (generally 1-5 acre parcels) in areas where there are currently non -conforming smaller <br />agricultural parcels located adjacent to urban centers. The intent is to accommodate rural development <br />close to towns and leave larger agricultural parcels for productive agricultural use. Note, this strategy of <br />allowing rural development near towns is not being recommended in towns surrounded by large agricultural <br />lots — in those cases, it is recommended that the urban area retain a 'hard edge' between the urban and <br />agricultural area so as not to create new, unnecessary split designations on parcels, or encourage rural <br />sprawl onto productive large -lot agricultural areas. <br />3. Factor 3: Align with State Land Use District Boundary. The third factor in developing LUPAG <br />recommendations is based on the Community's Objective #5, which states: <br />"Direct future settlement patterns that are sustainable and connected. Honor Hdmdkua's historic and <br />cultural assets by concentrating new development in existing, walkable, mixed-use town centers while <br />limiting rural sprawl." <br />This objective is important in that the three levels of Land Use regulation in Hawai'i (State Land use, County <br />Zoning, and County LUPAG) are not necessarily consistent with each other, and this can lead to regulatory <br />ambiguity. Now that current mapping technology allows us to provide more parcel -specific guidance, it is <br />important to reevaluate the State Land Use districts and County designations (zoning and LUPAG). Note: <br />2o1Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.