My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-03-28 Letter to Sylvia Luke re SB 1290 SD2 HD1 relating to the Transient Accommodations Tax
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Office of the Mayor Documents
>
2016-2020
>
Correspondence
>
2017
>
03-2017
>
2017-03-28 Letter to Sylvia Luke re SB 1290 SD2 HD1 relating to the Transient Accommodations Tax
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2017 1:09:31 PM
Creation date
3/29/2017 9:03:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ntr os� ' Wil Okabe <br /> �I��%�f ` Managing Director <br /> Harry Kim ,• r t'�'� • <br /> Mayor = <br /> Barbara J.Kossow <br /> re: +�'�` - Deputy Managing Director <br /> Countv of Pa x f l <br /> Offirt of file C uvrur <br /> 25 Aupuni Street,Suite 2603 • Hilo,Hawai`i 96720 • (808)961-8211 • Fax(808)961-6553 <br /> KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy.,Bldg.C • Kailua-Kona,Hawai`i 96740 <br /> (808)323-4444 • Fax(808)323-4440 <br /> March 28, 2017 <br /> Rep. Sylvia Luke, Chair <br /> Committee on Finance <br /> Hawai'i State Capitol <br /> Honolulu, HI 96813 <br /> Dear Chair Luke and Committee Members, <br /> RE: SB 1290, SD 2, HD 1 <br /> Relating to the Transient Accommodations Tax <br /> Thank you for this opportunity to testify against the latest draft of SB 1290, SD2, <br /> HD1 which deals with the Transient Accommodations Tax. We ask that the Committee <br /> substantially amend this version of the bill before going to conference. <br /> SB1290, SD2, HD1 would reduce the counties' share of TAT to $93M. An earlier <br /> draft (SB 1290, SD2) increased the share of TAT funds that go to the counties to $108M <br /> per year. We have hoped for a share even larger than $108M, and although we know <br /> that the State faces a financial dilemma not dissimilar from that faced by the counties, <br /> SB1290, SD2 recognized that without an increase in the counties' share of TAT, the <br /> counties would be forced to raise property taxes and/or reduce services to levels that <br /> most would find unacceptable. <br /> My understanding is that the TAT was originally established to assist the <br /> counties, but the Legislature has always had the prerogative to determine how it will be <br /> apportioned. Given Hawaii County's limited resources (and seemingly unlimited needs), <br /> we are fortunate that the Legislature has never wavered in allowing the counties to <br /> share in the TAT, and we thank you for that. <br /> History is important, and the TAT should really be thought of in two parts. When <br /> the TAT was originally established at 7 14%, the counties were the intended <br /> beneficiaries. Later on, when legislators took the politically unpopular step of increasing <br /> the TAT to 9 1/4 %, it was the legislators' necks that were on the line, so there is less <br /> County of Hawai`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.