My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-02-01 Hearing Transcript - County Council Initiated Bill 256
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-02-01 Hearing Transcript - County Council Initiated Bill 256
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2017 2:15:32 PM
Creation date
4/6/2017 2:15:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
JACKSON: The fine usually starts at $500 for the initial violation and then there's a date that <br />we give them to comply by, and then if there is recurring violations, it can be an additional fine. <br />I believe that starts at like one, two, and three hundred depending on how many reoccurring <br />violations there are. And, then there's also daily fines that would start at $100, and if they don't <br />comply by that deadline, then we issue the daily fine of a $100. <br />MIYASATO: Okay, thank you. <br />HENKEL: Mr. Ikeda? <br />IKEDA: Yes, you know, according to this bill, all rental units has to have a parking stall. Is that <br />correct? Like if the tenant, I mean the owner had three parking stalls, they need fourI mean <br />three rooms, they need four parking stalls. Is that correct? <br />JACKSON: That's correct. <br />IKEDA: And, all the cars have to be parked on the property. <br />JACKSON: That's correct. <br />IKEDA: So, okay, so I just wanted to make it clear so the people understand that if we should <br />pass something like this, then that's what would happen. <br />JACKSON: That's correct. I just want to clarify, though, that in this particular situation, I think <br />part of the problem is that the homeowner has five vehicles of her own, so <br />IKEDA: I understand, but <br />JACKSON: so, even though the Code would require four parking stalls on site, she would still <br />have, she, if parking is not prohibited on the street, she could park her other four vehicles on the <br />street. <br />IKEDA: I understand, but there have been problems where the visitors are parking on the street. <br />So, this would eliminate so-called parallel parking or whatever. <br />JACKSON: Yeah, it would eliminate people coming at night and not knowing how to park, <br />yeah. <br />HENKEL: Would it be appropriate for us to add a condition if we approve that, you know, three <br />parking stalls for the customers, and one for the owner, and then that would be the total parking <br />allowed. Is that what Mr. Ikeda just point out? Cause that's, it's not in there already. It just, it <br />just says on the property they have to have four, but there's nothing in there about parking on the <br />street. I just know that, you know, to park on the street, your car has to be licensed and <br />inspected. <br />JACKSON: Right. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.