My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-02-02 Liquor Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Liquor Control
>
Liquor Commission
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
2017-02-02 Liquor Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 8:58:01 AM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:08:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
reggae bands to start and that kind of a thing. But yes, that would run the gamut <br /> absolutely of all the entertainment we would have. <br /> Takase: Maybe if I can suggest, maybe we'll give them a two month trial period. That <br /> would give them a chance to show us all the different types of entertainment where we <br /> can keep track of them. If, assuming that you have complaints, then we'll just stay at <br /> where we're at. But if they don't have any complaints, what has to happen is they will <br /> have to come in to formally amend the conditions. That will require a notice to <br /> surrounding property owners again as well as a public hearing to amend the conditions. <br /> It's probably about a 3 or 4 month process anyway. <br /> Lopez: I'm familiar with the location. Where does the band sit in relative to your floor <br /> space? <br /> T. Hull: The Makai window where Humpy's is there and the back window facing the <br /> back with the music shooting back. <br /> Lopez: So the window will be open behind and the window to the left? <br /> T. Hull: Correct. <br /> S. Hull: Right now, both the windows are closed and the lanai people if we do <br /> entertainment can't see anything. Can't see the band or anything because the windows <br /> closed. <br /> Lopez: Understood. <br /> Mukai: I'm in favor of granting them the trial period but I'm looking at more of a six <br /> month period. The reason why is because condos; a lot of the owners are not there <br /> every day. A lot of condo unit owners might live in the mainland. So I'm thinking, down <br /> the road if you don't have any complaints and you come in for a license you'll have <br /> more credence if the trial period goes longer. Two months or six months doesn't make <br /> that much of a difference to me. But I'm thinking you'll have firmer ground to stand on if <br /> and when you do apply for the change in license, where you actually gave it a longer <br /> trial period where some of the people that lived here only once every third month, they <br /> had the opportunity to be in the lodging. <br /> Lopez: Keeping with that thought, it doesn't seem unreasonable. However, if you get <br /> an abundance of complaints then we have to do something. No, we can't just let them <br /> go for six months? <br /> Mukai: No, no. If a complaint comes up we have to nip it in the bud right there. We're <br /> giving them a trial period. It's not set in stone where it's going to be for six months. If <br /> something happens in between, it has to be addressed. <br /> Takase: We still take complaints during that time. If there are lots of complaints then <br /> your trial will end. <br /> FEBRUARY 2,2017-LIQUOR COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.