My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03-15-17 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2017
>
03-15-17 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2017 2:18:27 PM
Creation date
5/10/2017 11:42:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Adams: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Yeah without anyone present...I mean...I agree with you Doug I <br />mean we already made our decision...I think there's no reason this <br />is just a formality that we do to make sure that the wording <br />matches what we did and it's appropriate to what we did...what on <br />intent was so I'm inclined to just to approve it but that being said <br />we could continue this...I mean I don't know what the...it's clear <br />to me that it's...we made the right call...nothings gonna change <br />the call...it's whether we just say it or not...I don't know...I <br />would be open to continuing if either of you wanted to continue <br />but at this point I feel we should just approve it. <br />Madame Chair if it's okay I'd just like to ask our counsel for his <br />take on this and this puts him in a little bit of a position here <br />but...he's our counsel so. <br />Well as far as the procedural requirements I think Board Vice - <br />Chair Goodenow is correct...we would have to reverse course...go <br />backwards in time right and then reconsider and then decide to do <br />something else because the argument here being made is <br />that...sounds like and I don't have dates provided to us...that's the <br />curious part but it sounds like from the time that the Board issued <br />its decision til today...this issue has become moot because the <br />firefighters union has taken it off the table so to speak so arguable <br />speaking or technically speaking it is moot in terms of their issue <br />that they have before them. Now whether the issue is moot in <br />terms of this Board's decision making process...the valid point has <br />made that the Board has made it's decision based upon the facts <br />presented. So...so what I'm trying to say is...is that it's the <br />Board's call what you want to do because if you go forward with <br />the opinion based upon what you had at the time...that's fine. If <br />you go backwards because...it could go either way because you <br />can make the argument either way. <br />One question to our Corp. Counsel. If I'm not mistaken though if <br />we move to reconsider...it has to be at this meeting. <br />Right. <br />So we can't...we would have to make the motion and then <br />continue the motion I guess if we were gonna go that route. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.