HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeneral Plan Presentation 2017.5.9 Puna ACCounty of Hawaii
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTION COMMITTEE
General Plan Comprehensive Review
-\\A:��
`.K !�
April
,, - �. } ■iii
14
I
April Surprenant, AICD AIA
Manager of Long Range Planning
Hawai'i County Planning Department
Hilo Office
,Welcome
• Overview of the General Plan Comprehensive Review process
• Implications for community planning
• Next steps
Bethany
Y.0 op ++�
+f Lf r
'4�n �
Bethany Morrison
Long Range Planner
Hawai'i County Planning Department
Hilo Office
PUNA COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SEPTEMBER 2008
(Adopted September 10, 2008 by Ordinance No_ 08-116 & Amended: November 4, 2010 by
Ordinance No. 1x104; June 8, 2011 by Ordinance Nos_ 11-51, 11-52, & 11-53; & December6,
2011 by Ordinance No. 11-117 &11-118)
• Current PCDP AC priorities:
• Village/Town Centers
• Road Connectivity
• Internet Connectivity
• Preserving Native Ecosystems
• Farmers' Markets
• Medical Facilities
• Action Committee Role: Proactive,
community-based steward
• CDP Implementation:
• Successes
• Barriers
U61
where we,'ye xeew 1..4
Where we Are
where we i -e Ftegded
ABOUT
THE
GENERAL
PLAN
Sc
island -wide plans, rules, and policies
Provides a framework for region and
local plans
Looks out 25 years
Contents
• Goals
Policies
Implementation actions
J_ Implications
Future rezoning
Public improvements like roads
and water and sewer systems
Program priorities
Where We ✓e xeevL ,..4 Where we Are � Where we're Hegded
UPDATE WORKFLOW
Community Developmen
Public Input
Trend Scenario Alternate Sce rios Preferre Scenario Implementation Strategies
Technical Workshops
-_-=_- Models and Indicators
o
----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
August 2016
x's
where we've xeew EM� Where we Are Where we're
w
Gather Initial Community Input
Research & Analysis
-Community Workshops in Kona & Hilc
r`7
-Technical Meetings in Hilo & Kona
Strategy Development & Refinement
- Intergovernmental Coordination
- CDP Committees & Other Stakeholders
Finalize Recommendations
Adoption Process
where we've geew
Overview
where we.4re
• Scenario Planning & Maps • Scenario Planning & Maps
• Strategy & Policies • Strategy & Policies
• Community Planning • Community Planning
where were Headed
• Scenario Planning & Maps
• Strategy & Policies
• Community Planning
where we ✓e xeew ■♦ Where we Are
SCENARIO PLANNING
TREADS & FORECASTS
7 %
growth by 2040
2015: 195,000
2040: 296,000
■
By 2040, the fraction of homes in underserve
growth areas will increase from 16% to 22%
,)test growth
M
10
where we've xeew MM� Where we Are Where we're
Each Topic:
STRATEGIES& •Contextual Info
POLICIES ' Statutory Framework
• Key Drivers, Issues &Opportunities
• Data Sources, Indicators, and Metrics
• Funding &Budget Considerations
11
Where we,'ye xeevL Ww� Where we Are Where we're Hegded
COMMUNITY PLANNING REVIEW
• Built on Chapters 1 and 15 of General Plan
• Many CDPs have overlapping goals and objectives
• Many CDP recommendations have island -wide applicability
• Strategy types in community planning have been clarified:
• Goals
• Policy controls (limit the range of decisions that can be made)
• County actions (programs, projects, capital improvements, code changes)
• Non -county actions which include community actions
where we've xeew MM� Where we Are Where we're
QUESTIONS?
13
Overview
where we've geew where we.4re where were Fteaa'ed
• Scenario Planning & Map.
• Strategy & Policies
• Community Planning
• Scenario Planning & Maps
• Strategy & Policies
• Community Planning
Lk
rtr,i - f
W ' " *�
• Scenario Planning & Maps
• Strategy & Policies
• Community Planning
where we're peen where we A Where we're
CDP COMMITTEE MEETINGS
ANA • Regular Mtg. on May Stn
Puna:
YOU ARE
HERE!
15
where we'✓e geew sem.} Where WeA-Where we're Hegded
Scenarios
REFINEMENT: SCENARIO PLANNING
+j X
r
1
External
Forces
q4E w Trend"
Choices,
Strategies
U
TODAY FUTURE
Measures
16
where wwLlIe peen 1=4 where we Are Where we're � le,q, � 2'e, � 2'
CDP STj?A TEGIES
• Inform scenario planning
• Concentrate growth in regional and neighborhood centers
• Preserve open space and views
Examples-
Kona
South Kohala
Puna
Vlllase Cml—
� Regional
� Con�mumly
neigh:hood
■ Fulum L¢a[IuiiSLL
tofommumyRavvo
17
where wwLlIe peen where we
INTEGRATION
AND
REFINEMENT
w1lere We Ire
Individual GP Topic
Elements
where we'✓e geew mz.} Where WeA-Where we're Hegded
RELATIONSHIP TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANS (CDPs)
General Plan
• County -wide
• High -Level Policies and
Direction
• Framework Containing CDPS
egional Level
xtensive Community Input
ranslates General Plan into
ocalized Actions
Mutually dependent
19
where ww>/e peen 111111111111114 where we Are
Navigation ' x
Search document
HEADINGS PAGES RESULTS
1 Natural Resources
2 Historic and Cultural Resources
D 3 Public Access & Trails
D 4 Hazards
5 Scenic Resources
D 6 Land Use — Protected Areas, Open Space, and Preser._.
7 Land Use Settlement Patterns
D 7.1 Goals + Aspirational Policies
7.2 Policy Controls (limit the range of decisions tha...
7.3 County Actions (programs, projects, capital imp...
D 7.4 Non -County Actions (programs, projects, capita...
D 8 Land Use — Growth Centers
D 9 Housing
D 10 Land Use — Industrial Areas
11 Land Use — Resort Areas
D 12 Capital Improvements—General
D 13 Transportation
14 Utilities —General
15 Water
D 16 Wastewater
D 17 Telecom
D 18 Energy
D 19 Facilities - General
20 Solid Waste
D 21 Fire
W11 ere we're �IeA�2 e,�2'
Reshape Future Development Trends
Puna CDP
3,1.2.a. Implement tools for re -shaping the pattern of future development to prevent further sprawl,
such as land pooling.
3.1.2. k. Where possible, reduce density and build -out within the district by various means including
selective rezoning.
Establish a Growth Pattern
Dona CDP
Objective LU -1: Overall Growth Pattern. To identify areas where higher intensity growth areas should
occur and areas where the rural character and open space along the shoreline should be preserved.
Objective LU -3: Rural Area Growth Management. To preserve the rural character of the existing rural
towns, the agricultural lifestyle, and the open landscape.
Objective PUB -6: Quality of Life. To foster a sense of community and health through the public realm
such as gathering places, parks, pedestrian networks, and open spaces.
Limit Coastal Development to Coastal -Dependent Uses
Ka" u CDP Policy 26 - Encourage those developments that are not coastal dependent to locate in inland
areas. (HRS 205A-2(c)(3(D))
where we're peen where we A Where we're
QUESTIONS?
where we've geew
• Scenario Planning & Maps
• Strategy & Policies
• Community Planning
Overview
where we.4re
• Scenario Planning & Maps
• Strategy & Policies
• Community Planning
where were Headed
• Scenario Planning & Maps
• Strategy & Policies
• Community Planning
46
'v "JL i
+s
where we're peen where we Are where we're tteaa'ea'
Scenario Planning
Land Use &
Infrastructure Maps
7.1
Strate
C
r( )iir inti
Actions
y
COUNTY OF HAWAII
GENERAL PLAN
where we'✓e geew -.� Where we Are where we're Headed
ABOUT COMMUNITY PLANNING
GP Chapter 15
2005 Genera Pan- establishes
the Community Development
Pan (CDP) program
Hawaii County Code Ch. 16
• CDPs and the Action Opportunities
Committees are codified
• The Community Planning is a forum
for community input
• First General Pan Comprehensive
Review since the development of the
CDPs
where wwLlIe peen where we we where we're tteaa'ea'
STRENGTHS OF COUNTY COMMUNITY PLANNING
• Many CDP recommendations have island -wide applicability which
can be pulled up into the GP for implementation
• The General Plan likely also will provide further guidance on the
future of CDPs
• Clarification of strategy types makes it easier to identify the
community-based actions and collaboration opportunities
Ron
tai�
Ron Whitmore
Deputy Director
Hawaii County
Department of Research &
Development
Hilo Office
V-0 ! 40
*�
Department of Research & Development
• Advances sustainable community and economic
development
• Collects and develops data to guide program
development, policy-making, and decision-making
• Resource Center with staff in both Hilo and Kona
who focus on research and enterprise development
• Has Economic Development Specialists who focus
on: agriculture, energy, industry development,
tourism, and creative media/film
• Coordinates awareness of grant programs
• Provides $100,OOOs each year in community and
economic development grants
■
where we'✓e geew �.4 where we Are
COLLABORATION
�.} where we're Headed
State &Federal
• DLNR
• NPS
• DOH
Watersheds
Community
• HOAs
• Property owners
• Businesses
• Non -profits
GP
Action
Committees
ORMP
County
• R&D
• Planning
• DPW
• Parks & Rec.
16,
27
where we'✓e geew NM� Where we Are where we're Headed
ACTION COMMITTEE ROLES
• Lead: Be a proactive, community-based steward
of CDP implementation
• Liaise: Build partnerships with governmental and
community-based organizations to implement
the CDP
•Advocate: Guide and advocate to advance CDP
implementation
• Make Budget Recommendations: CIP and
operating
where wwLlIe peen MM� Where we we where we're tteaa'ea'
OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNITY-BASED LEADERSHIP
• Watershed management
• Open space and scenic
resources
• Public access and trails
• Cultural & historic resource
management
• Town/village planning
• Community infrastructure
• Emergency Preparedness and
Response
• Healthcare Services
• Affordable housing
• Economic development
�'� say ■ � 1 ' � - - �`
where we'✓e geew y Where we Are where we're Headed
COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP
Lead and Liaise
• Informal, flexible,
adaptable
• Decentralized, distributed
problem -solving
• Autonomous but
coordinated
hierarchy
30
where we'✓e geew EEI� Where we Are where we're Headed
COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP IN PUNA
• Community nodes:
• Pahoa Family Health Center
• Homeowners Associations
• Resource management sector:
• Ma -lama O Puna
• Pele Defense Fund
• Kapono (Red Road Scenic Byway
Committee)
• Puna Pono Alliance (Geothermal)
• Large landowners:
• W.H. Shipman Ltd.
• State of H awa i' i
• Economic sector:
• Main street Pahoa
• Other "allies" and "anchor"
institutions:
• Volcano Community Association
• Puna Medical Center
Oil
PUNA COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SEPTEMBER 2008
(Adopted September 10, 2008 by Ordinance No_ 08-116 & Amended: November 4, 2010 by
Ordinance No. 1x104; June 8, 2011 by Ordinance Nos_ 11-51, 11-52, & 11-53; & December6,
2011 by Ordinance No. 11-117 &11-118)
• Current PCDP AC priorities:
• Village/Town Centers
• Road Connectivity
• Internet Connectivity
• Preserving Native Ecosystems
• Farmers' Markets
• Medical Facilities
• Action Committee Role: Proactive,
community-based steward
• CDP Implementation:
• Successes
• Barriers
U61
where wwLlIe peen MM� Where we we where we're tteaa'ea'
QUESTIONS?
33
where we'✓e geew where we Are
FUTURE MEETINGS
WLtere We're
• Reqular Mtq. on May 91
• Special Mtg. June 131h
• Additional meetings as needed
• Exploration of scenario planning
*Advancing community planning:
• Puna & Islandwide
big
County of Hawaii
GENERAL PLAN COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW
o .ti
General Plan Website: cohplanningdept.com/general-plan/ o _':off-
t-_
Facebook- facebook.com/cohaeneral-plan
Stay u p to date!
_
mai . aeneralplan@hawaiicounjy.,c ,.
_ �.�..
77
yo
__-