Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeneral Plan Presentation 2017.5.9 Puna ACCounty of Hawaii COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTION COMMITTEE General Plan Comprehensive Review -\\A:�� `.K !� April ,, - �. } ■iii 14 I April Surprenant, AICD AIA Manager of Long Range Planning Hawai'i County Planning Department Hilo Office ,Welcome • Overview of the General Plan Comprehensive Review process • Implications for community planning • Next steps Bethany Y.0 op ++� +f Lf r '4�n � Bethany Morrison Long Range Planner Hawai'i County Planning Department Hilo Office PUNA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEPTEMBER 2008 (Adopted September 10, 2008 by Ordinance No_ 08-116 & Amended: November 4, 2010 by Ordinance No. 1x104; June 8, 2011 by Ordinance Nos_ 11-51, 11-52, & 11-53; & December6, 2011 by Ordinance No. 11-117 &11-118) • Current PCDP AC priorities: • Village/Town Centers • Road Connectivity • Internet Connectivity • Preserving Native Ecosystems • Farmers' Markets • Medical Facilities • Action Committee Role: Proactive, community-based steward • CDP Implementation: • Successes • Barriers U61 where we,'ye xeew 1..4 Where we Are where we i -e Ftegded ABOUT THE GENERAL PLAN Sc island -wide plans, rules, and policies Provides a framework for region and local plans Looks out 25 years Contents • Goals Policies Implementation actions J_ Implications Future rezoning Public improvements like roads and water and sewer systems Program priorities Where We ✓e xeevL ,..4 Where we Are � Where we're Hegded UPDATE WORKFLOW Community Developmen Public Input Trend Scenario Alternate Sce rios Preferre Scenario Implementation Strategies Technical Workshops -_-=_- Models and Indicators o ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- August 2016 x's where we've xeew EM� Where we Are Where we're w Gather Initial Community Input Research & Analysis -Community Workshops in Kona & Hilc r`7 -Technical Meetings in Hilo & Kona Strategy Development & Refinement - Intergovernmental Coordination - CDP Committees & Other Stakeholders Finalize Recommendations Adoption Process where we've geew Overview where we.4re • Scenario Planning & Maps • Scenario Planning & Maps • Strategy & Policies • Strategy & Policies • Community Planning • Community Planning where were Headed • Scenario Planning & Maps • Strategy & Policies • Community Planning where we ✓e xeew ■♦ Where we Are SCENARIO PLANNING TREADS & FORECASTS 7 % growth by 2040 2015: 195,000 2040: 296,000 ■ By 2040, the fraction of homes in underserve growth areas will increase from 16% to 22% ,)test growth M 10 where we've xeew MM� Where we Are Where we're Each Topic: STRATEGIES& •Contextual Info POLICIES ' Statutory Framework • Key Drivers, Issues &Opportunities • Data Sources, Indicators, and Metrics • Funding &Budget Considerations 11 Where we,'ye xeevL Ww� Where we Are Where we're Hegded COMMUNITY PLANNING REVIEW • Built on Chapters 1 and 15 of General Plan • Many CDPs have overlapping goals and objectives • Many CDP recommendations have island -wide applicability • Strategy types in community planning have been clarified: • Goals • Policy controls (limit the range of decisions that can be made) • County actions (programs, projects, capital improvements, code changes) • Non -county actions which include community actions where we've xeew MM� Where we Are Where we're QUESTIONS? 13 Overview where we've geew where we.4re where were Fteaa'ed • Scenario Planning & Map. • Strategy & Policies • Community Planning • Scenario Planning & Maps • Strategy & Policies • Community Planning Lk rtr,i - f W ' " *� • Scenario Planning & Maps • Strategy & Policies • Community Planning where we're peen where we A Where we're CDP COMMITTEE MEETINGS ANA • Regular Mtg. on May Stn Puna: YOU ARE HERE! 15 where we'✓e geew sem.} Where WeA-Where we're Hegded Scenarios REFINEMENT: SCENARIO PLANNING +j X r 1 External Forces q4E w Trend" Choices, Strategies U TODAY FUTURE Measures 16 where wwLlIe peen 1=4 where we Are Where we're � le,q, � 2'e, � 2' CDP STj?A TEGIES • Inform scenario planning • Concentrate growth in regional and neighborhood centers • Preserve open space and views Examples- Kona South Kohala Puna Vlllase Cml— � Regional � Con�mumly neigh:hood ■ Fulum L¢a[IuiiSLL tofommumyRavvo 17 where wwLlIe peen where we INTEGRATION AND REFINEMENT w1lere We Ire Individual GP Topic Elements where we'✓e geew mz.} Where WeA-Where we're Hegded RELATIONSHIP TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANS (CDPs) General Plan • County -wide • High -Level Policies and Direction • Framework Containing CDPS egional Level xtensive Community Input ranslates General Plan into ocalized Actions Mutually dependent 19 where ww>/e peen 111111111111114 where we Are Navigation ' x Search document HEADINGS PAGES RESULTS 1 Natural Resources 2 Historic and Cultural Resources D 3 Public Access & Trails D 4 Hazards 5 Scenic Resources D 6 Land Use — Protected Areas, Open Space, and Preser._. 7 Land Use Settlement Patterns D 7.1 Goals + Aspirational Policies 7.2 Policy Controls (limit the range of decisions tha... 7.3 County Actions (programs, projects, capital imp... D 7.4 Non -County Actions (programs, projects, capita... D 8 Land Use — Growth Centers D 9 Housing D 10 Land Use — Industrial Areas 11 Land Use — Resort Areas D 12 Capital Improvements—General D 13 Transportation 14 Utilities —General 15 Water D 16 Wastewater D 17 Telecom D 18 Energy D 19 Facilities - General 20 Solid Waste D 21 Fire W11 ere we're �IeA�2 e,�2' Reshape Future Development Trends Puna CDP 3,1.2.a. Implement tools for re -shaping the pattern of future development to prevent further sprawl, such as land pooling. 3.1.2. k. Where possible, reduce density and build -out within the district by various means including selective rezoning. Establish a Growth Pattern Dona CDP Objective LU -1: Overall Growth Pattern. To identify areas where higher intensity growth areas should occur and areas where the rural character and open space along the shoreline should be preserved. Objective LU -3: Rural Area Growth Management. To preserve the rural character of the existing rural towns, the agricultural lifestyle, and the open landscape. Objective PUB -6: Quality of Life. To foster a sense of community and health through the public realm such as gathering places, parks, pedestrian networks, and open spaces. Limit Coastal Development to Coastal -Dependent Uses Ka" u CDP Policy 26 - Encourage those developments that are not coastal dependent to locate in inland areas. (HRS 205A-2(c)(3(D)) where we're peen where we A Where we're QUESTIONS? where we've geew • Scenario Planning & Maps • Strategy & Policies • Community Planning Overview where we.4re • Scenario Planning & Maps • Strategy & Policies • Community Planning where were Headed • Scenario Planning & Maps • Strategy & Policies • Community Planning 46 'v "JL i +s where we're peen where we Are where we're tteaa'ea' Scenario Planning Land Use & Infrastructure Maps 7.1 Strate C r( )iir inti Actions y COUNTY OF HAWAII GENERAL PLAN where we'✓e geew -.� Where we Are where we're Headed ABOUT COMMUNITY PLANNING GP Chapter 15 2005 Genera Pan- establishes the Community Development Pan (CDP) program Hawaii County Code Ch. 16 • CDPs and the Action Opportunities Committees are codified • The Community Planning is a forum for community input • First General Pan Comprehensive Review since the development of the CDPs where wwLlIe peen where we we where we're tteaa'ea' STRENGTHS OF COUNTY COMMUNITY PLANNING • Many CDP recommendations have island -wide applicability which can be pulled up into the GP for implementation • The General Plan likely also will provide further guidance on the future of CDPs • Clarification of strategy types makes it easier to identify the community-based actions and collaboration opportunities Ron tai� Ron Whitmore Deputy Director Hawaii County Department of Research & Development Hilo Office V-0 ! 40 *� Department of Research & Development • Advances sustainable community and economic development • Collects and develops data to guide program development, policy-making, and decision-making • Resource Center with staff in both Hilo and Kona who focus on research and enterprise development • Has Economic Development Specialists who focus on: agriculture, energy, industry development, tourism, and creative media/film • Coordinates awareness of grant programs • Provides $100,OOOs each year in community and economic development grants ■ where we'✓e geew �.4 where we Are COLLABORATION �.} where we're Headed State &Federal • DLNR • NPS • DOH Watersheds Community • HOAs • Property owners • Businesses • Non -profits GP Action Committees ORMP County • R&D • Planning • DPW • Parks & Rec. 16, 27 where we'✓e geew NM� Where we Are where we're Headed ACTION COMMITTEE ROLES • Lead: Be a proactive, community-based steward of CDP implementation • Liaise: Build partnerships with governmental and community-based organizations to implement the CDP •Advocate: Guide and advocate to advance CDP implementation • Make Budget Recommendations: CIP and operating where wwLlIe peen MM� Where we we where we're tteaa'ea' OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNITY-BASED LEADERSHIP • Watershed management • Open space and scenic resources • Public access and trails • Cultural & historic resource management • Town/village planning • Community infrastructure • Emergency Preparedness and Response • Healthcare Services • Affordable housing • Economic development �'� say ■ � 1 ' � - - �` where we'✓e geew y Where we Are where we're Headed COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP Lead and Liaise • Informal, flexible, adaptable • Decentralized, distributed problem -solving • Autonomous but coordinated hierarchy 30 where we'✓e geew EEI� Where we Are where we're Headed COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP IN PUNA • Community nodes: • Pahoa Family Health Center • Homeowners Associations • Resource management sector: • Ma -lama O Puna • Pele Defense Fund • Kapono (Red Road Scenic Byway Committee) • Puna Pono Alliance (Geothermal) • Large landowners: • W.H. Shipman Ltd. • State of H awa i' i • Economic sector: • Main street Pahoa • Other "allies" and "anchor" institutions: • Volcano Community Association • Puna Medical Center Oil PUNA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEPTEMBER 2008 (Adopted September 10, 2008 by Ordinance No_ 08-116 & Amended: November 4, 2010 by Ordinance No. 1x104; June 8, 2011 by Ordinance Nos_ 11-51, 11-52, & 11-53; & December6, 2011 by Ordinance No. 11-117 &11-118) • Current PCDP AC priorities: • Village/Town Centers • Road Connectivity • Internet Connectivity • Preserving Native Ecosystems • Farmers' Markets • Medical Facilities • Action Committee Role: Proactive, community-based steward • CDP Implementation: • Successes • Barriers U61 where wwLlIe peen MM� Where we we where we're tteaa'ea' QUESTIONS? 33 where we'✓e geew where we Are FUTURE MEETINGS WLtere We're • Reqular Mtq. on May 91 • Special Mtg. June 131h • Additional meetings as needed • Exploration of scenario planning *Advancing community planning: • Puna & Islandwide big County of Hawaii GENERAL PLAN COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW o .ti General Plan Website: cohplanningdept.com/general-plan/ o _':off- t-_ Facebook- facebook.com/cohaeneral-plan Stay u p to date! _ mai . aeneralplan@hawaiicounjy.,c ,. _ �.�.. 77 yo __-