Laserfiche WebLink
Summary of Comments on 2017-04-26 emc minutes bennett <br />comments.pdf <br />Page: 1 <br />Number: 1 Author: drrhbennett Subject: Sticky Note Date: 5/23/17, 8:14:20 AM <br />2. Is NOT an accruate depiction of what was said by Bennett <br />After contacting B and C Director Kurcharski request that future request for information be directed through him. <br />The next sentence does not belong in that paragraph. Moreover it is very unclear and therefore meaningless <br />Number: 2Author: drrhbennett Subject: Sticky Note Date: 5/23/17, 8:18:35 AM <br />There is no reference or infomation about a conclusion. It an incomplete depiction of what was said. <br />At issue was the statement by B and C that the SAT ponds would remove 90% of the Phosphorus and do so for 30 years. This conclusion was unsupported <br />by the presentation andfurthere documentation is needed. Therefore Bennett cannosupportot the statements regarding the SAT pond performance <br />Number: 3Author: drrhbennett Subject: Sticky Note Date: 5/23/17, 8:20:45 AM <br />Balance is completely unclear. It would mean little to a person reading the minutes who was not there. <br />