Laserfiche WebLink
is...the way this is written is that you have...anyone that works <br /> for...any officer or employee who works has twelve period <br /> right...when it has...when you have...when that individual had <br /> official duties that have...you're directly connected with <br /> something...been under your active consideration or you had <br /> obtained information which by law is not available to the general <br /> public. That I don't think applies here necessarily but the other two <br /> do. When you are a Director or Deputy Director...that puts you in <br /> a broad expand of things that fall under your purview even if you <br /> had specific duties you have the whole... <br /> Mr. Van Bergen: Yes correct. <br /> Mr. Adams: Nature of what's happened within the department as well. Given <br /> the information that you've applied to us here...it seems to me that <br /> the park and actually even your direct involvement with the <br /> subdivision of the parcel into the 6 acre and 4 acre <br /> portion...there's a specific...that's active consideration...I don't <br /> think we can run away from that and as a result...that means that <br /> you have...that was something you had direct connection with and <br /> you were directly concerned with according to using the term in <br /> the statute and so that triggers then that twelve month requirement <br /> to me. So the fact that you have...frankly I'm happy to hear that <br /> you had the ability to firewall yourself off from that so that <br /> whatever actions being taken by your employer for that...you're <br /> able to...that's an option for you...I just think that...for me that <br /> that...even if that wasn't unfortunately I would still have to come <br /> down on the fact that it's triggered therefore there's a twelve <br /> month rule in place on this particular situation...not excited about <br /> that because I think that the consequences of something like this is <br /> that we take good people...qualified people...they come in and <br /> then they go back to what they were doing and we're telling them <br /> they can't do what they were doing before they were coming in for <br /> twelve months. I'm not sure that's the desire of this but that is how <br /> I read this. Of course, I'm always open to hearing Counsel's <br /> wisdom on this. <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: In terms of which question Board member Adams? In terms of <br /> your interpretation of the code or... <br /> Mr. Adams: What I just talked about...yeah. <br /> 15 <br />