My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05-09-17 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2017
>
05-09-17 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2017 1:52:21 PM
Creation date
6/13/2017 1:52:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was brought to my attention there was a developer on a nearby <br /> parcel...parcel 121 about a half mile...quarter mile away that was <br /> proposing to build his fair share park on this La'aloa parcel. So it <br /> was a really good fit...it made sense...the County would finally <br /> get a park...a public park. It's a better location for the park in his <br /> subdivision which is right off Ali`i Drive with very little access. <br /> He has eleven acres of parcel that he's going to build 61 homes on. <br /> The PUD's been approved and the SMA has been approved and so <br /> that's moving forward and in the ordinance for that rezoning for <br /> that parcel...eleven acre parcel the rezoning ordinance said in <br /> Condition C which I submitted to you that he could put a <br /> three...minimum three acre park within half/quarter mile of the <br /> development that would be okay as far as the rezoning ordinance. <br /> So...it made sense for him...made sense for the County so my <br /> main role on this parcel was working on the subdivision cause at <br /> the time that...YMCA still owned the parcel and the County had <br /> had two agreements with the Y....one in 2001 and then one in <br /> 2008...it got extended and the agreement basically said the Y had <br /> so much time to build the park or the County could take the whole <br /> ten acres back for a dollar. So...I met with the Y and the current <br /> administration didn't just want to take the whole parcel back cause <br /> the Y still wanted to do something eventually so we worked out an <br /> agreement with the YMCA that they...we split the ten acres into <br /> two parcels...6.3 acres and a 4.2 acre parcel. The Y kept the 4.2 <br /> and the County was deeded about two years ago the 6.5 acre parcel <br /> with the intent that the developer would be able to put that three to <br /> four acre park there...okay. So my role basically was just to do the <br /> subdivision. I'm the one that met with the Y...worked through the <br /> you know my land experience...worked out the subdivision...got it <br /> approved and that's was pretty much it. When I left the <br /> County...December 5...twelve noon. I went back into private <br /> practice...I have a real estate/broker's license and commercial real <br /> estate brokers...I've had it since 2003 and I was approached by the <br /> developer to help him with this subdivision. So I'm consulting for <br /> him on his 61 homes...he wants to build and a part of that project <br /> is this park. So...which I did have some involvement with when I <br /> was at the County a couple of years ago before I went to <br /> housing...from parks I went housing about a year and a half ago <br /> and that's where I ended my County employment as assistant <br /> administrator...but...so that's kind of the situation...I don't have <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.