Laserfiche WebLink
Member Rivera pointed out the direct conflict between the GP designation of industrial <br />lands versus the general urbanization boundaries on the Kona CDP. Member Payne <br />asked the Director what the future role of the updated GP will be versus the provisions of <br />the role and function of CDPs in the future. Director Yee explained his desire to have <br />future and revised CDPs all follow a standard template of format and content to allow a <br />better understanding of each and every CDP with regard to the GP as we go forward. <br />Director) that the AC be updated every 3 4 months of the ongoing progress in updating <br />the GP, so that they \[the AC members\] maintained a better understanding of their <br />intended role and scope of work. Director Yee replied that the GP-CDP interrelationship <br />and CDP structural template concepts remains undetermined and are still evolving <br />concepts <br /> <br />No action was moved by the Committee with regard to this agenda item. <br /> <br />5. -Year Capital <br />Improvement Program FY 2017- <br />recommendations of the Kona CDP Action Committee. <br />Staff distributed copies of page 9 of the referenced budget submittal of March 1, 2017, <br />Childs identified thereon a culvert-bridge replacement project in Kahului, North Kona, <br />along Ali`i Drive, approximately 1 mile <br />south of Kailua Village, and together with the Puna emergency access-connectivity <br />project, as the only two roadway projects in the current CIP budget proposal. <br />Member Kimura noted the large budgeted amount for the expansion of the Kealakehe <br />Wastewater treatment plant, and that this was a very necessary project for the healthy <br />growth of North Kona and implementation of the Kona CDP. Councilmember Eoff <br />interjected her concurrence with the necessity of that wastewater project, and noted that <br />this particular budget sheet does not reflect existing appropriations and funded projects. <br />Member Palacat-Nelsen asked if staff could compile a list of the existing appropriations <br />and funded projects; staff Childs said he would do so for reporting at the next meeting. <br /> <br />6. <br />Improvement Program (CIP) and fiscal year Capital Improvement Budget (Budget) <br />from the perspective of a <br />agency recommendations, referral of Countywide recommendations to the Mayor, <br /> and Budget and submittal to the County <br /> <br />Staff Childs passed out copies of a flowchart he composed, as an unofficial document <br />only, to illustrate what happens when the AC makes CIP recommendations, from a <br />general process standpoint both graphically and with text explanations below. He <br />flowchart, although different directors over time have exercised their prioritization roles to <br />greater or lesser degrees. He discussed the various steps in the annual budgetary <br />process flow, including referral of AC recommendations to particular departments, <br />opportunities for discussions between the Planning Director and other department <br />Page 7 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />