Laserfiche WebLink
Member discussions included broadening community awareness of the CDP, and the <br />Kailua Village Master Plan \[Redevelopment Plan\]. Member Ogin identified the <br /> for which there is no common understanding in our community <br /> in achieving a desirable future for Kailua-Kona and Kailua Village in particular. April <br />involving a wide variety of selected community members to determine what future was <br />desirable for Pahoa as a town, a community survey done, and much further discussion. <br />She explained that this led to an appropriation for a town master plan, and drafting <br />design guidelines. <br />Discussion also addressed the legal structure of subcommittees and alternate means for <br />AC members to interact/network with other citizens as members of other citizen groups <br />having very specific objectives. Planner Santiago gave a specific example of Puna <br />citizen groups, some of which are fully independent but include two AC members as <br />members of or liaisons to that group, and others are a formal, AC-appointed <br />investigatory sub-committee group. He urged the AC to be very clear as to what they <br />are trying to accomplish in such an effort, and in some cases separate, small <br />subcommittees might be better to tackle specific issues that could later be brought <br />together into a single, larger subcommittee. <br />Chair DeFranco suggested that a committee to look at what <br />a Kailua Village redevelopment plan actually would mean or addressthe <br />scope of such a plan, and to get funding to actually make it happen. She opined that it <br />would need a trained facilitator to bring all the community elements together. <br />MOTION: Ogin/Schattauer: Create an investigatory subcommittee to review and <br />analyze the current development plan for Kailua Village and develop scope for a future <br />redevelopment plan. Motion carried unanimously. <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br />1. Subcommittee Reports: (None) <br />2. Status of existing Action Committee sub-committees: Dissolve or reaffirm <br />continuing, defined investigatory missions for all existing sub-committees <br />MOTION: After cursory discussion noting the legal need for all subcommittees to be <br />investigatory and of limited term accordingly, it was moved/seconded by Ogin/Palacat- <br />Nelsen to dissolve all existing (prior to today) subcommittees. <br />After discussion of membership on the four-member maximum Kailua Village <br />subcommittee, Palacat-Nelsen, Ogin, and perhaps Rivera were suggested as initial <br />members. <br />MOTION: For formality, it was moved/seconded by Ogin/Palacat-Nelsen to re-affirm the <br />establishment of the Kailua Village subcommittee. Motion carried unanimously. Chair <br />appointed Ogin and Palacat-Nelsen and also appointed Rivera subject to his agreement <br />to serve. <br />CHAIR DIRECTIVE: As to Open Space as a subcommittee, Chair DeFranco suggested <br />placing Open Space objectives and a possible subcommittee on the next meeting <br />agenda, and members tacitly agreed. <br /> <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />