My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-04-10 Leeward Exh A (REZ 17-217)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-04-10 Leeward Exh A (REZ 17-217)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2017 4:16:33 PM
Creation date
6/15/2017 4:16:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DARROW: Thank you. <br /> <br />UNGER: Are there, is there more water units available? Should the Commission say it’s okay for <br />a second dwelling, is there four units available, water units? Is that even an issue at this point? <br /> <br />DARROW: We didn’t specifically ask, but I believe that there are because this area is in Low <br />Density Urban, and so — <br /> <br />UNGER: Water is available. <br /> <br />DARROW: Yeah, there should be enough water units available. <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay. And just to clarify and make sure I have the correct understanding, so when you <br />are, the proposal right now is to give a favorable recommendation to the subdivision but not a <br />second dwelling via an additional CPR or an ‘ohana permit or a farm dwelling permit. So by <br />nature of the zoning that sits there right now there is no, there is no CPR ability anyways because <br />that’s no longer available; ‘ohana is not an issue because it’s zoned Ag. So really all we are <br />saying is, not a second ag dwelling on these parcels. <br /> <br />DARROW: Correct. <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay. <br /> <br />DARROW: For them to be able to be approved for an additional farm dwelling is the similar <br />process that they did originally to get the second dwelling on his property. So they would have to <br />do that again. <br /> <br />UNGER: Right. Correct. Carr Smith. <br /> <br />CARR SMITH: I have more question. I’m not that familiar with Family Agriculture zoning. Is <br />there anything unusual in that zoning that we should know about? <br /> <br />DARROW: It allows, the main thing is, it allows for smaller lots. Right now our Zoning Code for <br />the State Land Use Agricultural, I mean for the County Agricultural, the minimum lot size is five <br />acres. For Family Agriculture it’s one acre. So you’ll see requests come in from Agricultural, like <br />this, Agricultural 5 acres, instead of coming to Agricultural 2 acres they are coming in for Family <br />Agricultural 2 acres. When you look at the permitted uses side by side, there are little less, as far <br />as agricultural uses, they are little less impactful than Agricultural zoning, like, large stock <br />production on a larger scale, those types of things. But it does allow quite similar uses as the <br />Agricultural district. <br /> <br />CARR SMITH: Thank you. <br /> <br />UNGER: Thank you. Any other questions? Thank you. <br /> <br />DARROW: Thank you. <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.