My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-04-10 Leeward Exh A (REZ 17-217)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-04-10 Leeward Exh A (REZ 17-217)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2017 4:16:33 PM
Creation date
6/15/2017 4:16:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DARROW: Well, in this particular case we are looking at one property, and so you had the <br />original dwelling, which I believe was Mr. In’s, and then the Inabas came in for an additional farm <br />dwelling. If the Change of Zone is approved, then this would be two separate parcels; each <br />person, the Inabas as well as Mr. In, could come in for an additional farm dwelling agreement. So <br />the Inabas’ additional farm dwelling would most likely be just the first farm dwelling at that point <br />on that property. <br /> <br />SHIMAOKA: Thank you. <br /> <br />UNGER: Commissioner Church. <br /> <br />CHURCH: Jeff, I’m still a little confused here. So J says that “Restrictive covenants in the deeds <br />of all proposed lots shall give notice \[that the terms of the zoning ordinance\] prohibit the <br />construction of a second dwelling …,” to give notice about second dwelling. So does that get <br />altered then? <br /> <br />DARROW: Well, we would, the request at this point is to remove Condition J. <br /> <br />CHURCH: Okay. <br /> <br />DARROW: And then the Planning Department would provide additional language, if the <br />Commission is entertaining this change. If I can elaborate shortly, normally, as I mentioned, our <br />standard condition is not to increase in density in these. In this particular situation we are looking <br />at a larger agricultural property in an area that is located within the General Plan Land Use Pattern <br />Allocation Guide Map of Low Density Urban. So it’s actually, long-term plan for this area is <br />residential, to allow for higher density. So in this particular case we could see an allowance for <br />this particular request. <br /> <br />UNGER: Thank you. Commissioner Carr Smith. <br /> <br />DARROW: I’m sorry, Mr. Chairman. <br /> <br />CARR SMITH: So with the Family Agriculture, if this condition were not there, that zoning <br />would allow for a second dwelling? <br /> <br />DARROW: If this was not through a Change of Zone and it was currently zoned Family <br />Agriculture, it would, an applicant could apply for an additional farm dwelling agreement. And <br />just to clarify for the Commission, an additional farm dwelling agreement isn’t an automatic <br />approval; there is a process that you go through to be approved for that, showing that the <br />agricultural activity on the property generates the need for an additional dwelling. <br /> <br />UNGER: Dr. In, are you familiar with that form and what — <br /> <br />IN: Yes, I am. <br /> <br />7 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.