My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-04-10 Joint Meeting Exh A (Amend Commission Rules)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-04-10 Joint Meeting Exh A (Amend Commission Rules)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2017 4:20:31 PM
Creation date
6/15/2017 4:20:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
matter, as well as time limitations on examination and cross-examination of witnesses, whether <br />or not parties are represented by counsel.” And I believe, and Malia can correct me if I’m <br />wrong, I believe that this language came about because we had a contested case with several <br />intervenors and they all had different issues, and so we were attempting to consolidate their <br />concerns and issues and it became difficult. So I think this language is just to kind of help clarify <br />that. Is that correct, Malia? <br /> <br />HO: Yeah, that’s correct, and it’s also used in other commissions like the Public Utilities <br />Commission, which has, the last hearing had, I think, 30-something – I don’t know the exact <br />number – intervenors and it just becomes kind of unmanageable unless you put these kind of like <br />clarifications and restrictions and give the hearing officers the power to like, you know, kind of <br />just hone it in so that everything can get solved in a proper amount of time without undue delay. <br /> <br />JACKSON: Did that answer your question, Chair Henkel, or Commissioner — <br /> <br />HENKEL: Yeah. <br /> <br />JACKSON: Okay. All right, the next provision, the next change would be to add a provision to <br />clarify the purpose of a pre-hearing conference with the presiding officer. And ‒‒ <br /> <br />CLARKSON: Oh wait. Wait. <br /> <br />JACKSON: Yes. <br /> <br />CLARKSON: Can we go back briefly? <br /> <br />JACKSON: Yes. <br /> <br />CLARKSON: I have a question about 4-6(a), which is the Prehearing Procedure. I’m confused. <br />It says any person, “Any other person seeking to intervene as a party shall file a written request <br />on a form,” this is where you pay your 200-dollar filing fee, “no later than seven calendar days, <br />prior to the Commission’s first meeting on the matter.” Okay, so this means before, does this <br />mean that before the Commission meets to consider an application, all intervenors have to pay <br />their 200 dollars and apply to become an intervenor seven days before the first meeting on that <br />matter? <br /> <br />JACKSON: Yeah, I think I know where you’re going with this, Commissioner Clarkson. It <br />seems like this section should be further up in the rule, like earlier on in the rule, because the, <br />any party who wants to intervene needs to do it seven days prior to the first hearing held by the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />CLARKSON: So the Planning Commission publishes its agenda how many days prior to the <br />meeting? <br /> <br />JACKSON: We’re required to at least ten days prior. <br /> <br />5 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.