My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-06-01 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless USE 15-000059
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-06-01 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless USE 15-000059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2017 2:21:25 PM
Creation date
7/6/2017 2:21:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
be flexible on the timeframe in regards to that as far as a recommendation to the Commission. <br />So, if we would have received a petition untimely within the seven days that they were supposed <br />to submit, we would still recommend that the Commission consider it as a timely submittal based <br />on the, the time that the letters went out. <br />In this particular situation, this application came in, in 2015. There was first and second <br />notification done at that time, but then it was delayed. NobodyI mean, we did receive one <br />response which was responded to in email but not a petition. When the application was <br />requested to continue again, we asked the Applicant to again send out a first notification as well <br />as second notification to the surrounding property owners. So, there has been a number of <br />notifications that have been sent out to the surrounding property owners. <br />HENKEL: Thank you, and we did get, I guess one letter. <br />DARROW: Correct, that was in <br />HENKEL: —You know, so they, they were notified <br />DARROW: —2015. Yeah. It was some time ago. <br />HENKEL: All right. Commissioners, any questions for the Applicant? <br />CLARKSON: Yes, <br />HENKEL: —Yes, Mr. Clarkson. <br />CLARKSON: I have a couple of questions. One thing I noticed on the site plan is that the <br />access road widths do not confirm to the Fire Department's requirements. Will you be reviewing <br />that? <br />MARTIN: There is a condition, there's one part, one of the conditions is that we, that we <br />comply with all Fire regulations, and so I passed that comment along to our architect and asked <br />him to address it. <br />CLARKSON: Okay, and then the other question I have is regarding, well, the wind stability of <br />the monopole. I notice the wind standard that it has to meet is a 105 miles per hour. <br />MARTIN: Building Department standard, yeah. <br />CLARKSON: Right. I'm still a little bit concerned about that in the case as in this case where if <br />the pole actually did fall over in a windstorm or hurricane or tropical storm, it would impact <br />structures. Do you have any comments about the history of failures of these kinds of poles in a <br />windstorm? <br />MARTIN: Yes, this has come up before when we did have a contested case and somebody <br />brought that argument up, and so we did research, and we found that the majority of the failures, <br />EXHIBIT A <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.