My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-06-01 Hearing Transcript - Kau CDP
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-06-01 Hearing Transcript - Kau CDP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2017 2:24:25 PM
Creation date
7/6/2017 2:24:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SELF (from audience): Right. Or even with you guys. <br />WHITMORE: Keiko, quick question. This meeting is agendized as a Steering Committee <br />meeting. Is that correct? <br />MERCADO (from audience area): Yes. <br />WHITMORE: Yes, all right—we have an answer. <br />HALL: There we go. <br />HENKEL: Okay, thank you. <br />WHITMORE: Okay, very briefly. I have everything we presented back in May at the hearing, <br />but I have no intention to present it all again because it's the same four Commissioners here <br />present, same staff Do want to give a very brief refresher and then touch on a few items. One is <br />a question that came from a Commissioner that I'd like to respond to, and the second is some <br />additional public comment that was received by the Department between meetings. <br />Again, big picture. I tend to have a pretty calm demeanor, but I am really very excited to be at <br />this point in the process, and this very much is a cause for celebration because the Ka`u <br />community and the Steering Committee members specifically have worked long and hard to get <br />to this point, and we very much appreciate the support that we, that the plan received through <br />agency review and through the Director's positive recommendation. But, again, just to reinforce <br />some of the three key things to keep in mind as you're concluding your deliberations is that this <br />was, this process that resulted in this recommended plan was extremely credible, highly <br />participatory, collaborative, very systematic, strategic, and transparent. So, throughout the <br />process, the process was clear, the decision points were clear, and everybody who had a stake in <br />the decisions being made had more than ample opportunity to weigh in. <br />Which leads to the second point that this has been vetted at all levels to an extreme—at the <br />community level, Steering Committee level twice, and through agency review. And, again, to <br />remind you, every single strategy in the Community Development Plan has a rationale behind it <br />that is in writing, and so if questions do come out, come up about specific policies or actions, we <br />ask that you start with the rationale behind those when considering any potential recommended <br />revisions to be consistent with the process that's led us to this point. <br />So, again, the CDP does what you would expect from a community plan, and as is provided, <br />as—for the direction also provided in the General Plan in Chapter 15, does four fundamental <br />things. One is it lays out the preferred land use pattern for the district. And, then building on <br />that foundation, it tackles very specifically, the three main pillars of what makes for healthy, <br />sustainable communities: natural and cultural resource management; the building blocks of <br />community including infrastructure facilities and services; and then what builds on top of that, a <br />resilient, sustainable local economy. And, those numbers on the screen there correspond with <br />EXHIBIT C <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.