Laserfiche WebLink
CASE #25582 — RM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC <br />TMK 7-3-010-051-0037 <br />Appellant was not present. It was noted for the record that the notice of hearing was delivered on <br />October 6, 2016. Present for the County was appraiser Matthew Radmilovic. <br />Property located in the Seascape condominium complex at the bottom of Kaiminani Drive. <br />Appeal on building value. <br />County presented their case together with any and all information provided by the appellant. County <br />recommended sustaining the land value at $39,500 and building value at $210,000. A call for <br />questions was made. <br />Mr. Ventura moved to approve the County's recommended valuation. Seconded by Ms. <br />Reinhard. A call for discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote of 5:0. <br />CASE #25581 — RM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC <br />TMK 7-5-020-073-0258 <br />Appellant was not present. It was noted for the record that the notice of hearing was delivered on <br />October 6, 2016. Present for the County was appraiser Matthew Radmilovic. <br />Property located in the Alii Lani condominium complex on Alii Drive. <br />Appeal on building value. <br />County presented their case together with any and all information provided by the appellant. County <br />recommended sustaining the land value at $22,400 and the building value at $190,500. A call for <br />questions was made. <br />Mr. Takai moved to sustain the County's values. Seconded by Ms. Reinhard. A call for <br />discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote of 5:0. <br />CASE #25424 — RUSALAVITCH, RAYMOND A <br />TMK 7-3-046-094-0000 <br />Appellant was not present. It was noted for the record that the notice of hearing was delivered on <br />September 21, 2016 and the appellant contacted the division to state that he would not be attending. <br />Mr. Jo presented for the County. <br />Property located on Holoholo Street in the Kona Acres subdivision, mauka of the Kona Airport. <br />Appeal on building value. <br />County presented their case together with any and all information provided by the appellant. County <br />recommended sustaining the values. A call for questions was made. <br />Mr. Takai moved to sustain the County's assessment. Seconded by Mr. Dinges. A call for <br />discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote of 5:0. <br />3 <br />