My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-07-06 Hearing Transcript - HI Island Distilling SLU 17-047 & REZ 17-218
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-07-06 Hearing Transcript - HI Island Distilling SLU 17-047 & REZ 17-218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2017 12:20:20 PM
Creation date
8/4/2017 12:20:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MIYASATO: Okay, thank you. <br />HENKEL: Any other questions? Thank you, Mr. Fuke. I have no one signed as, signed up to <br />testify. Is there anybody out there who would like to contribute? If not, we'll look for a motion. <br />MIYASATO: Chair, I just have one quick question for the Chair [sic -Director]. Is that <br />Condition C, is that the intent? Just not to resell? The industrial <br />YEE: Maija, did you have a comment? <br />JACKSON: I doI did. I could try to answer that for you if that's all right. The intent of that <br />condition was to actually not to allow the County water system to be used for any production <br />facilities. So, anything that would go into the final product would come from the water well, not <br />from the County system. So, the intent, and if you look at I think the next condition, <br />Condition D, the intent was to allow County water to be used for like the employee areas for <br />handwashing, restrooms, things like that, but not for water to be used for the actual production of <br />any bottled product. <br />MIYASATO: So, is that, does that work out for the operation? <br />FUKE: Yes, it does. I mean, that was always the Applicant's understanding. You know, and he <br />was aware that, you know, they're all competitors, right, and had this other water company, they <br />was using County water and bottling it as, you know, their own precious water, so he <br />absolutely—you know, it's bad for marketing. You know to say that you're gonna use County <br />water and then you're saying that you're going to market that as your own product. So, you <br />know, he's totally aware of it, and you know, he finds that condition very acceptable. <br />MIYASATO: Okay, thank you. <br />HENKEL: Thank you. No one signed up to testify. Is there a motion to close that portion of the <br />hearing? <br />MIYASATO: Motion to close public testimony. <br />IKEDA: Second. <br />HENKEL: It's been closed—moved and seconded to close public testimony. All in favor say <br />Ic aye?" <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />HENKEL: Opposed? Then, we'll move onto discussion and a motion for action. <br />MIYASATO: Chair, I make a motion. I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to <br />the County Council on the application for State Land Use Boundary Amendment SLU 17 - <br />EXHIBIT C <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.