My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-06-28 Environmental Management Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
2017-06-28 Environmental Management Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2018 1:11:39 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 4:06:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
wastewater discharge to the ground be disinfected by appropriate means. He would like <br />this Commission to go on record and say this is the appropriate thing to do. Fortunately <br />with the new R1 system we will be using ultraviolet which is better than using chlorine. <br />o Dr. Bennett moved to have the Commission adopt this letter and send to Director Pressler, <br />with a copy to Director Kucharski and the County Council. Mr. Fear seconded. Mr. Olson <br />had a point of information and asked if we are sending this letter to the State Director of <br />Health or are we going to send to the Mayor? Aren't we trying to get the Mayor's support <br />for this letter? As a courtesy the Mayor should get it first. Ms. Schoen stated we had a <br />discussion about this last time that the Commission advises the Mayor, but the <br />Commission wanted to send the letter directly to the Director of Health. Chair Fritz agreed <br />the letter should go to the Mayor, County Council and the Director of Health. Motion was <br />amended to send this letter to the Mayor, County Council and Director Pressler. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />c. Presentation by Dr. Bennett on Wastewater Microbiology Monitoring Program <br />o The Department of Health is implementing a law called the Beaches Act that State <br />monitors beaches and post the beaches as appropriately. <br />o The State has been testing recreational waters for at least 100 years using various <br />methods. The one they are using now has huge limitations. <br />o The island of Hawai`i has a lot of cesspools. Dye was put in a toilet in Puako and it <br />showed up on the coast in a matter of hours. Given our geology, we have an unusual <br />hydrology. Around 30 million gallons a day is being discharged in to cesspits or septic <br />systems. The way in which these microbes die is not known. In this wastewater is about <br />410,000 pounds of nitrogen. The State of Hawaii, Department of Health tells everyone <br />that when you put in a septic system, all your problems are solved. However that is not <br />true. Septic systems are only a little better than cesspools. The wastewater drains to the <br />sea. Our monitoring tools are underfunded and poorly staffed. We simply don't know if <br />the water is safe. By them pronouncing the water is safe is irresponsible. <br />o Looking at the history of measuring Fecal Indicator Bacteria (FIB); back in the 1800s a <br />standard was formed in New York City but had to drop it because it measure too much of <br />everything. Then came up with a similar test but with a higher incubation temperature <br />where you could grow these things. But this too had the same problem. Then <br />Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) comes along with a thing called enterococci. <br />EPA regulations requires them to have a precise test and attribute risk to that test. <br />Enterococci is an environmental bacteria that can be found growing in swamps and rivers. <br />There are over 50 species but only 2 species associated with humans. It grows in clusters <br />or chains so makes it difficult to count. It doesn't correlate with the presence of fecal <br />viruses which is the leading reason why people get sick from being in the water. Over the <br />last 100 years we did a good job with cleaning up surface water. Enterococci is measured <br />using the most probably number method, which is a range not an actual count. Results <br />are available within 24 hours and is an estimation at best. EPA is the least pleased with <br />this test because it's such a big range. If the test shows the most probable number is 35, <br />the State will continue sampling. If the number jumps to 130 then they need to post signs <br />at the beach. The State plays some funny games with the arithmetic. State takes the <br />arithmetic mean of the numbers, but EPA says since bacteria is not in a linear distribution <br />but in a logarithmic distribution, statistically it's more appropriate to do a geometric <br />mean. Therefore very few of our beaches have been listed as impaired due to bacteria. <br />Whenever the State says the levels are less than one, it's actually 2.3. <br />o Study shows surfers ingest about 170m1 of water per day. They are 5.91 times more <br />likely to get skin infections. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.