Laserfiche WebLink
business would impact neighboring properties. With all of the Applicant's statements and <br />requests, the establishment of a large Industrial business in a residential area would <br />negatively impact neighbors. The increased volume of traffic and long work hours, <br />neighboring properties would feel the adverse effects. In the long term, neighboring <br />property will also see a major devaluation in property values. <br />b) Statement C - "Does not unreasonably burden public agencies." <br />a. Due to the type of business performed at the Facility, it has been brought to the attention of <br />SKTSC that instances of arson have been known to occur at the site from frustrated and <br />malicious customers. This information has been directly stated from the Waimea Fire <br />Department Captain. <br />b. The increase to the volume of stored vehicles would exacerbate this type of criminal <br />behavior. Without the means to limit or halt this type of activity, police and fire protection <br />would have a taxing job to deal with these situations. <br />c. The increased volume of cars using Kauakea Road and the intersection on Mamalahoa <br />Highway would at some point call for traffic safety improvements. This in turn would be a <br />burden on the Department of Public Works to make said improvements at the expense of <br />taxpayers. <br />7) Statement D - "Unusual conditions, trends, and needs have occurred since the district boundaries <br />and regulations were established." <br />a. There has been land appropriated to industrial use in the Waimea area. It is to the <br />community's benefit that business like the Applicant's seek out from large landowners <br />acreage and sites that are deemed appropriate for this type of business. <br />b. Other businesses that are stated in this document (Horizon Automotive and Deluz J. <br />Automotive) as grounds for validation of the approval of this permit's requests operate at <br />much smaller scales. The growth of the Applicant's business and the requests to terminate <br />the life of the permit no longer qualify this as a special permit case, and is granting the <br />Applicant and future businesses the opportunity to exploit the Hawaii County Land Use <br />Codes. <br />B) Statement E -"Does not substantially alter or change the essential character of the land and the <br />present use." <br />a. This statement may only be said for the current business at the Facility. It is inappropriate to <br />make such broad statements for future use and growth. At this time, it cannot be determined <br />how the requested development and growth would alter the Iand. <br />9) Statement F -"Would not be contrary to the General Plan or the Zoning Code." <br />a. The request to increase the Facility in size and scale would no longer qualify this business as <br />a small, home -business operation. This sort of development Is contrary to the Hawaii County <br />Agricultural Zoning Code. <br />b. This development is also contrary to the Community Development Plan set forward by the <br />South Kohala Community Development Plan (SKCDP). SKCDP is a legal Ordinance of Hawai'i <br />County, and the Planning Director has a legal obligation to follow the law and implement the <br />Policies and Action Plans of the SKCDP. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) set <br />forward by the SKCDP does not allow for industrial businesses to be developed in prime <br />agricultural zones. Further policies regarding "responsible growth" and environmental <br />stewardship for Waimea call on the County to protect said agricultural assets. <br />Concluding remarks: <br />It is important to note that the individual requests from the Applicant are reasonable In their own right but in <br />Its entirety and as a whole, these requests greatly compound, and indicate the development of a larger -scale <br />industrial operation. It is imperative that perpetuity is not granted for any such permits, not just for the <br />Applicant's, but also for similar requests. Permission of this type would grant other businesses an <br />opportunity to exploit the Land Use Code, would diminish property values for neighboring parcels, and would <br />eliminate prime agricultural land that has a growing demand to meet the State, County, and community <br />desires of becoming more self-sufficient <br />