Laserfiche WebLink
2. Consideration of establishing additional investigatory subcommittees. <br />Chair DeFranco asked Committee members if there was a desire to form additional <br />investigatory subcommittees. <br />Discussion on a potential Community Outreach Subcommittee ensued. Mr. Childs informed <br />Action Committee members about the limitation of Sunshine Law on the viability of hosting a <br />Facebook page. The concern was raised about the difficulty involved with keeping up with <br />community comments while doing outreach. It was the general consensus that the Action <br />Committee lacks the manpower to appropriately respond to too many public participants in <br />an online forum. The Action Committee explored the idea of seeking outside help to take on <br />such a project. A discussion followed about the possibility to having outside, unaffiliated <br />groups do videography of Action Committee members for use as an outreach tool. <br />The Action Committee was reminded about the idea of individual members liaising with <br />other community groups rather than forming a subcommittee for the sake of convenience <br />and efficiency, as liaising is not subject to the strictures of the Sunshine Law if no more than <br />two Committee Members are interacting with any one community group and each other in <br />such respect. It was suggested to ask the Planning Department to present to the Action <br />Committee about the ways to liaise without conflicting with the Sunshine Law. <br />A discussion took place regarding the formation of a subcommittee or liaison group in order <br />to do more community outreach and in particular manage a Facebook page. Planning staff <br />reminded those present that Sunshine Laws prohibit any Action Committee member from <br />representing the rest of the Action Committee, especially on Social Media platforms. The <br />Action Committee was informed that other CDPs have had their own Facebook pages which <br />have previously been administered by the Planning Department. It was further discussed that <br />although the Facebook pages existed in the past, the feasibility of continuing a presence on <br />social media is something that must be looked into by the Planning Department. <br />Committee Member Rabin moved for the County to create a Facebook page for the Kona <br />Action Committee that would solicit input from the general public. Second by Committee <br />Member Palma-Glennie. <br />The Action Committee was reminded that public input is already considered through the <br />process of vetting the Kona CDP. <br />The Action Committee discussed the possibility of using Facebook as a means to just <br />broadcast meeting reminders instead of a forum for discussion. <br />A Committee Member expressed his concern that in responding to social media discussion, <br />the Action Committee may be setting itself up to spend too much time vetting public input <br />and will not have the time to focus on important issues concerning the district. He was also <br />concerned about potential conflicts of interest when gaining input from large pools of <br />individuals. <br />A Committee Member expressed her opinion that a website, if it is formatted properly, <br />provides an adequate way for community members to be informed. She went on to say that <br />connecting with other community groups through liaison group reporting would be a much <br />more effective way of pooling together and understanding public opinion. <br />www. cohplannin,-dept- com kona(dhawadcounty.zov Page 5 <br />