My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-03 Performance Audit Report: County of Hawai'i's Department of Human Resources Hiring Practices
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2017-03 Performance Audit Report: County of Hawai'i's Department of Human Resources Hiring Practices
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2018 11:05:07 AM
Creation date
9/8/2017 12:44:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In 2016, DHR filled 404 civil service positions. We reviewed 46 recruitments from calendar year <br />2016. This consisted of 12% of total recruitments and 100% of recruitments in our audit scope <br />of classes of work. Forty-two (91 %) of these recruitments contained questionable hiring <br />practices. Specifically we found: <br />Some departments did not review all applications for employment and <br />circumvented DHR's Skill Set Criteria Evaluation procedures used to identify <br />applicants to be interviewed. <br />State law (HRS §76-1) requires the selection of persons based on their fitness and <br />ability for public employment. To meet this law, the County assesses the desired skill <br />set for the position in relation to the current and accurate position description and class <br />specification. A skill set is a particular category of knowledge, skills, and abilities <br />determined to perform the essential job duties. <br />0 42 instances within three departments (P&R, DPW, and Finance) where they did <br />not consider all applications or candidates on the referred list. <br />0 42 instances within three departments (P&R, DPW, and Finance) where the skill <br />set criteria evaluations were not uniformly conducted. <br />0 21 instances within two departments (DPW and Finance) where they used a <br />random selection generator in Microsoft Excel to identify applicants to interview <br />prior to the skill set criteria evaluation. <br />0 10 instances within one department (DPW) where personal letters of interest <br />were used from potential applicants on the referred list to determine the interview <br />pool. <br />0 18 instances within two departments (DPW and Finance) where they bypassed <br />potential candidates based on the applicant's address on their application. <br />Some departments did not comply with interview and records retention <br />procedures. <br />State law (HRS §76-1 (2)) requires impartial selection of individuals for public service by <br />means of competitive tests which are fair, objective, and practical. In addition, an <br />interview and records retention is required by DHR to ensure and validate the <br />information the applicant provided on the application and to evaluate the applicant's <br />fitness to perform the essential job duties described on the position description. <br />0 4 instances within two departments (P&R and Finance) where the department did <br />not conduct interviews and/or retain interview and selection results. <br />1 instance within one department (Finance) where the department filled a <br />Clerk III position with an expired contract hire after proceeding with open - <br />recruitment. No interviews were conducted. Open -competitive recruitment <br />requires an interview. <br />Audit Results 12 1 P a g e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.