My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-07-25 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
2017-07-25 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 7:19:29 AM
Creation date
9/21/2017 7:22:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawai’i Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – July 25, 2017 <br /> <br />TL: It’s fine to get an opinion from you? <br /> <br />PB: I can give an opinion if I think I’m qualified. I’ll give you an opinion on what I <br />think is good for palila or bad for palila but there’s a lot I wouldn’t know – <br />there’s just many unknowns. <br /> <br />TN: Over these 25 years that you’ve been doing research – has the other agency <br />come to you for your opinion? <br /> <br />PB: Yes. <br /> <br />TN: And so if these agencies have come to you for their opinion than we can <br />come to you for your opinion also? <br /> <br />PB: We have to come to an understanding of what my opinion is going to be <br />based on. I can’t give you just my personal opinion as a sort of a hunch – I <br />mean, I’m constrained to give you an opinion based on some research. <br /> <br />DY: If somehow there was funding for research on the impact of the sheep or on <br />the palila, then a study could be conducted to do that? <br /> <br />PB: Somebody probably would be willing to do that study – but I would point out <br />that most people who are gonna be funding things comes from government <br />sources. <br /> <br /> Yeah, I mean, there are private sources of money for endangered species <br />research but generally it’s public funding. People are going to say well what <br />research has already happened. The first thing that would occur in any <br />research project is let’s look at – what has happened – so they go to Paul <br />Scowcroft’s research and they say here’s Jon Giffin’s research and here’s <br />what we know from those time periods and under those circumstances and <br />then they would maybe build on that. I don’t think it’s an unexplored issue. It <br />may not be as thoroughly explored as you might wish – be careful about <br />encouraging a research to do more – because that’s what we love to do more <br />research <br /> <br />DY: So you’re telling me to go study the existing stuff first. <br /> <br />PB: I would examine that and if you see deficiencies, then that’s something that <br />maybe somebody could address and say OK that study did such and such <br />but now we have other ideas that could be explored. <br /> <br />DY: So I have a related question – as it relates to endangered species – they’re <br />always comes a point especially with vertebrates that there is discussion <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.